Your Honor |
Post Reply |
| Author | |
ajqtrz
Postmaster Joined: 24 May 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Topic: Your HonorPosted: 10 Feb 2016 at 01:42 |
|
I've been in discussion about honor as of late. Seems some people want to define the word by how they feel rather than to focus on what the word actually means.
From Dictionary.com: "honesty, fairness, or integrity in one's beliefs and actions." From this I would say that if you say you are going to do something you keep your word. Even if it costs you more than you thought it would. From this I would say you focus on what is fair to all sides. And from this, if you state belief, you live by that belief. You strive to be honorable because people know you will follow up on what you say. I've observed the claim of being "honorable" made by some persons and alliances under the most dubious circumstances. I've seen terms of war broken because the leader of the alliance figured out after agreeing to the terms, that the terms were favorable to the other side. I've seen an alliance add members to their alliance, large members, after they agreed they wouldn't issue any new invites. Then, when confronted with their dishonorable actions, they made no effort to claim that they had not broken their word, and just went about their business. I've seen an alliances promise to leave players of two or less cities out of the war, and then attack a player with two cities. When confronted, no apology, no admitting of error, just silence. I've see an alliance claim they want a fight to be fair, and then have four of their players, with over three times the population and twice the number of cities, join in the battle. I've seen an alliance, claim they want a fair fight, allow their "champion" to add his alt after he was unable to siege the first city he tried, even though he was a third larger than his opponent even without his alt. I've seen words given and then broken on at least four occasions. Is that what it means to be honorable? And this alliance insists they are honorable! Words have meaning. If they didn't and we could all just make up what we would like them to mean it would be a pretty brutal place. We aren't the Cheshire Cat of Alice in Wonderland and words don't mean "whatever we want them to mean, nothing more, or nothing less." The word honor can only be applied to those who honor their own word. HIGH stands for Honor, Integrity, Generosity and Humility. I"ve thought a lot about the first and find that there are no perfectly honorable people but there are those who fool themselves by saying they are honorable and then don't honor their own word, and those who admit they fall short and try to correct it. That's what I do because once you've lost your honor you can't even believe yourself. Those are my thoughts on honor. What are yours? AJ |
|
![]() |
|
Barghest
New Poster Joined: 10 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply Posted: 10 Feb 2016 at 22:50 |
|
Ok, so I have never posted in the forums before and probably won't do again but seeing as though it is now "honourable" to throw veiled insults and silly accusations around in here which directly target me I thought I'd step in.
I am the "champion" named above (Barghest) - it's not that hard to figure out, I recently razed AJQ2's capital. I attacked AJQTRZ because I wanted to. Primarily because he maintains a diplomatic stance of war against my alliance. As a strategist, I think it would be rather shortsighted of me to allow an enemy to prosper and develop unchallenged on my doorstep to a point where he might pose a threat. I think the notion of "competitive advantage" eludes some folk. I have never claimed to be honourable nor am I honour-bound. This is about war. Plain, simple and as far as I am concerned - quite logical. War isnt pretty or clean. Have I used my alt - the answer is yes....but why wouldnt I. Why would a player (at war) not use all assets at his or her disposal? Why would I (in this particular instance) make it easier for an enemy who has been employing the use of both of his accounts for some months now. On the matter of honour - Let me pose two questions: 1. Is it honourable to use the forums to slander another player. Using half truthes and inaccurate reports? 2. Is it honourable to hide behind allies asking them to negotiate on your behalf before undermining their efforts by making puerile forum posts designed to antagonise? Edited by Barghest - 10 Feb 2016 at 23:08 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply |
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |