why isnt there talk of the war here

https://illyriadpost.wordpress.com/2015/06/20/freedom-war-dispatch-1-2/

illyriadpost wrote: Practice of land-grabbing is most unjust to those yielding low power

It should be noted that several of the Imperialist pigs in TVM are currently "yielding low power." They and those members yielding slightly more power benefit equally from our claim.

Edited by abstractdream - 20 Jun 2015 at 12:57

i for one am very disappointed in several of the land claim members who are laying siege, and razing cities outside of their land claim areas! these actions seem to demean the concept of the current land claims as simpely another typical old fashion and out of date unannounce land claims that are in existence but not vocally broadcast to the other members of the game...i hate to say it but raing players for no strategic reason is nothing different than a 20 city accounts sending 700k siege...i urge all to just siege within their land claims areas and use all other war and dip function to diminish their enemies so they are not capable of war! i still support land cliams but until the devs change the out of whack function of siege to ruin players easily and force them from the game, i will look poorly upon any group that sieges and razes out of their land claim areas and unfortunely might encourage myself and others to take action against any group that is using a function to ruin others game and force them out...pleas use the other functions....thank you!

are you saying that the land claiming alliances should not attack cities that could be used against them while they are at war with the owner of that city?  

twilights wrote: totally agree with u, stomp is the aggressor but as a group that promotes land claim for self, which i agree, and to aggressively siege outside that area and raze when your group could easily diminish those cities so they have no military capacity i wonder of what your land claim really is. I personally dont agree with raze as it encourage players to quit...i do like the idea of buffer areas in which siege and raze is allowed but in free areas i disagree with siege function on both sides and really look down upon those that raze outside their claim areas...if that means i disagree with those using siege that have no land claims...totally true...seige and raze ruins game play, as we have seen in the past. I just wonder when the devs wake up and make that function less damaging and allow an escape clause so the game gains players and makes war play more enjoyable and less stressful....but u make ur bed, u lay in it...u use use dip and other attack functions to achieve objectives outside ur land claim areas..seige and raze is just plain bullying