|
Post Reply |
Page <1 1516171819 23> |
| Author | ||||
abstractdream
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 02:00 |
|||
|
Ok, 5 Whys:
1. Why is there a war involving a major amount of the largest alliances in this game? Because several alliances declared against several others. 2. Why did those several alliances declare war? They are trying to stop a single alliance, namely the Night Crusaders. 3. Why did they start wars with several alliances instead of just NC? Because they believe NC is controlled by these several alliances. 4. Why do they believe NC is controlled by these several alliances? Because they were allies during a previous period of war. 5. Why do they believe these allies can control NC? Because that is how they would do things if it were them. So, root cause of this war is that the vCrow side of this believe H? should have reined in NC and since they didn't they feel H? and all of their allies must be attacked. Solution? Yeah, I don't know how to convince vCrow and all their allies that if they had a problem with NC they should have dealt with NC. I guess they believe H? would have just attacked them so they did it first. Seems pretty flimsy for a war that will cause so much damage but such is life in Illy... |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Vanerin
Forum Warrior Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 418 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 02:19 |
|||
|
Wow... I don't think I have seen such an organized list of assumptions before...
Abstract, have you heard of Occam's Razor?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Sisren
Forum Warrior Joined: 03 Feb 2012 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 03:33 |
|||
|
Actually Vanerin,
This is
exactly how the 5-Why's are used. Good job abstractdream.
I am certified to say this btw ^.
I may not agree to the approach taken, but it does lend itself to The Current State.
The 5-Why's is a common-sense tool to understand 'what is really going on'. Once this is identified, true counter-measures can be put in place. Counter-measures like actually communicating in an open and real time manner, rather than running to a friend because some other friend took your ice cream(or bacon).
Had the opposition used something like this, or a more methodical approach, we might not have posts like 'why we are fighting?', or 'so-and-so should control someone(s) not in their alliance', or even better - 'Let's plot a war of revenge against this-other-so-and-so'.
That is the past however, and is what contributed to The Current State. We need a better Future State.
Humbly,
Sisren
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 04:04 |
|||
...They didn't actually, though. Every alliance they are fighting declared or indirectly acted in the defense of NC (excepting possibly RES?). H? entered the war of their own accord.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Vanerin
Forum Warrior Joined: 05 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 418 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 04:33 |
|||
|
Hmm, perhaps I don't understand 5 Whys very well (extremely probable), but I thought they were used to help reduce assumptions. I only see one (possibly two) of Abstract's points that are firmly grounded in evidence.
Also 5 Whys may not be the most useful tool in this conversation. It generally fails when there are multiple root failures. And I think multiple root failures are highly likely in this instance because there are so many different groups of people with different approaches. Each group and approach could have it's own root failure.
~Vanerin
P.S. If I am misunderstanding anything about the 5 Whys, please do educate me!
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Epidemic
Postmaster Joined: 03 Nov 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 768 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 05:28 |
|||
|
The 5 Whys seem to be some what accurate from what has been said here and in gc.
I would amend #3 to say 'Because they think NC either controls or is in cahoots with these alliances' and the root cause would be better interpreted as 'they had no choice but to declare on H? once they sided with NC and declared war on EE'. I've heard many, many people state that TVM was considered a feeder alliance for NC. I could be wrong with part of this but I think it's accurate from my interpretation of events. Edited by Epidemic - 04 Nov 2013 at 05:28 |
||||
![]() |
||||
Deranzin
Postmaster Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 09:30 |
|||
And every time you do not like the facts your only contribution to a topic each time is to come out of the blue and say all those nice things about me and NOTHING ELSE. No facts and arguments from Grego ... just slander ... great way for a discussion dude
Someone's got a problem here and it sure ain't me !
No, it is not, because it does not provide any counterpoint or data or facts. Some of them want revenge (which is a fact epidemic ignored). Others, like Tamaeon, made it clear that they just want power and care for nothing else (another fact epidemic ignored). Others, I cannot fathom what they might want, but seems to me that those two first groups would make a very natural team, as objectives go, and when people join that group they either agree with that agenda or it coincides with their own, wouldn't you agree .?. So, when you have a group of people consisting of people that want revenge and people that want power and other people that join them for not known (at least in public) reasons, then you can bet your money that those people's agenda is at least served by the first two groups objectives. Ergo you can either call this war a matter of revenge or a matter of power-hunger or both, with all three cases being correct and based on actual data. Edit :
So, what you hear from many people, is automatically true .?.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0ZZJXw4MTA
Edited by Deranzin - 04 Nov 2013 at 09:37 |
||||
![]() |
||||
Redfist
Greenhorn Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Location: Duraz Karag Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 10:17 |
|||
|
I am afraid that Deranzin's post do seem to move way off topic. At first I thought that it was just his way of expressing himself but then I noticed that it happens all to frequently and usually in threads that hold views that he doesn't agree with. Additionally he always tends to personalise and enflame issues and the above post is an example of that.
I could give a number of factual examples of this but that would derail this thread.
Getting back on subject as to why are we (you)are all fighting. You are fighting because players like Bonfyr Verboo of TVM, Sir Brad of NC and KP of H? want you to fight. Their idea of fun is what you are experiencing in Illy now. They want Illy to be a war game in which they have more or less a good advantage built over a period time to attack, belittle, siege and humiliate other players. They do not value the crafting, marketing and roleplaying aspects of the game as much as they do "Hard Core" warmongering. Why is that?
Well , for me , Deranzin summed it up the other day in GC when he stated :
"
It's fun. I get a big kick out of it"
Edited by Redfist - 04 Nov 2013 at 10:19 |
||||
![]() |
||||
Gragnog
Postmaster Joined: 28 Nov 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 10:55 |
|||
Actually I was there when he used those words, and they were in no way used in relation to the war at all but in an answer as to why he was responding to the troll who was also present at the time. Lets at least try to use quotes in the right context.
|
||||
|
Kaggen is my human half
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Tamaeon
Wordsmith Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Posted: 04 Nov 2013 at 11:00 |
|||
it most certainly does.
Edited by Tamaeon - 04 Nov 2013 at 11:02 |
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply |
Page <1 1516171819 23> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |