| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
The Resistance 
New Poster
Joined: 29 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 8 |
 Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 19:36 |
|
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what?
|
 |
-hypocritical-
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 81 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 19:56 |
 The Resistance wrote:
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what? |
actually the seige that is on leytonstone isn't h? atleast not directly, bu an sta encampment no idea what they are doign there but hey :|
dunno about the 3rd seige either, unless they are seiging 2 of cranks or gigi's cities?
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 19:59 |
|
I wish everyone would stop saying H? are the good guys so they have to do this or they can't do this. "Good" is a matter of opinion. Just because you think they're doing something wrong doesn't mean they agree and it certainly doesn't mean your right and their wrong. Besides, they could be doing much worse and destroying all of the players cities. They could even be really cruel and destroy the smaller city last so they'd start out with less research. While I'm not sure I agree that taking revenge is a good thing, at the very least they're not completely destroying the player.
|
|
Mandarins31
Forum Warrior
Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 418 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 20:16 |
The Resistance wrote:
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what? |
Sieges actually in action:
1 against Gigi (Coconut)
Sieges in preparation:
1 against Crank (Parthus) ----> the biggest one
1 against Gigi (SolidElectronics)
1 against Leyton (Leyton) ----> May be indirectly an action of H? as Hypocritical said.
Edited by Mandarins31 - 30 Sep 2010 at 20:16
|
|
-hypocritical-
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 81 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 20:18 |
Brids17 wrote:
I wish everyone would stop saying H? are the good guys |
they give themselves the image of being the good guy, it's the joys of good PR and a large army if anyone disagree's
|
|
Laccy
Greenhorn
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 56 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 20:47 |
-hypocritical- wrote:
The Resistance wrote:
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what? |
actually the seige that is on leytonstone isn't h? atleast not directly, bu an sta encampment no idea what they are doign there but hey :|
dunno about the 3rd seige either, unless they are seiging 2 of cranks or gigi's cities?
|
The army outside Leytonstone is actually a H? army, not an StA army. (Sorry hypocritical, I read the wrong scout report. With apologies to StA too.)
|
|
-hypocritical-
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 81 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 20:57 |
Laccy wrote:
-hypocritical- wrote:
The Resistance wrote:
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what? |
actually the seige that is on leytonstone isn't h? atleast not directly, bu an sta encampment no idea what they are doign there but hey :|
dunno about the 3rd seige either, unless they are seiging 2 of cranks or gigi's cities?
|
The army outside Leytonstone is actually a H? army, not an StA army. (Sorry hypocritical, I read the wrong scout report. With apologies to StA too.)
|
:( and what is the reason for that seige can anyone for h? tell us? because laccy wasn't a major part of the white/h? war, and you have not mentioned his wrong doings(of which there is none) in any thread, mail or chat
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 21:04 |
-hypocritical- wrote:
Laccy wrote:
-hypocritical- wrote:
The Resistance wrote:
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what? |
actually the seige that is on leytonstone isn't h? atleast not directly, bu an sta encampment no idea what they are doign there but hey :|
dunno about the 3rd seige either, unless they are seiging 2 of cranks or gigi's cities?
|
The army outside Leytonstone is actually a H? army, not an StA army. (Sorry hypocritical, I read the wrong scout report. With apologies to StA too.)
|
:( and what is the reason for that seige can anyone for h? tell us? because laccy wasn't a major part of the white/h? war, and you have not mentioned his wrong doings(of which there is none) in any thread, mail or chat
|
There is no siege. Only an army sitting on a square. Same thing with the other two. It's not a siege until someone sieges you. Please be more precise with your accusations.
Edited by Kumomoto - 30 Sep 2010 at 21:04
|
|
-hypocritical-
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 81 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 21:09 |
Kumomoto wrote:
-hypocritical- wrote:
Laccy wrote:
-hypocritical- wrote:
The Resistance wrote:
H?, who exactly are you sieging now? Whats this about sieging four good members? Are they all former Black's or what? |
actually the seige that is on leytonstone isn't h? atleast not directly, bu an sta encampment no idea what they are doign there but hey :|
dunno about the 3rd seige either, unless they are seiging 2 of cranks or gigi's cities?
|
The army outside Leytonstone is actually a H? army, not an StA army. (Sorry hypocritical, I read the wrong scout report. With apologies to StA too.)
|
:( and what is the reason for that seige can anyone for h? tell us? because laccy wasn't a major part of the white/h? war, and you have not mentioned his wrong doings(of which there is none) in any thread, mail or chat
|
There is no siege. Only an army sitting on a square. Same thing with the other two. It's not a siege until someone sieges you. Please be more precise with your accusations.
|
fine why a large army with the most likely intent seiging sitting beside leytonsitne, and cannot seige another other [good] cities
and so you are saying that you aren't going to seige Crank and gigi then? that you are just putting your army there for sh*ts and giggles, if you do plan to seige them, then one can safetly assume that a 3rd army beside the alliance capital will most likely be a seige army, is it's a precise accusation, unless I am missing something?
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2010 at 21:14 |
-hypocritical- wrote:
fine why a large army with the most likely intent seiging sitting beside leytonsitne, and cannot seige another other [good] cities
and so you are saying that you aren't going to seige Crank and gigi then? that you are just putting your army there for sh*ts and giggles, if you do plan to seige them, then one can safetly assume that a 3rd army beside the alliance capital will most likely be a seige army, is it's a precise accusation, unless I am missing something?
|
We don't have an army next to your alliance capital. Do you even know what city your alliance capital is?
Btw. NICE "H" on your signature! ;)
Edited by Kumomoto - 30 Sep 2010 at 21:18
|
|
Tweet
What to do with H?