| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
Llyorn Of Jaensch 
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924 |
 Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:16 |
 StJude wrote:
So, darling, semantics fail on your part, it IS a legitimate question. Since TD stated this is one of several reasons for VALAR being attacked, then it is a fair question for me to come here and ask, does TD speak on your behalf or no? You could have answered "Yes" or "No" to the question, |
Jude: Do you
honestly expect
anyone to believe you were o' so starry-eyed inquiring as to whether TD speaks for the coalition.
Lets call that one rhetorical.
Reaching mate (embarrassing a little, no?).
StJude wrote:
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Awww are you thought you won one.
|
Not sure what to call that fail, but I lol at your misfortune nonetheless.
|
But
ouch, consider yours put in my place with that one. Spelling mistake corrected for you specially.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule
|
 |
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:17 |
Tordenkaffen wrote:
St.Jude - Am I understanding all of this right, that you - at your limited population level - want to be free to attack other players, yet not be attacked by players larger than yourself?
Coz needless to say that would be a really...arrogant standpoint.
Its hard to follow the actual substance of threads when they go off topic in all directions with regular intervals.
We discussed the "Is it fair to attack an newbie" subject, now I think you need to answer - in as few words as possible - the question above.
|
I have not and will not claim that. And to be as clear as possible, I do not claim the right to be " Free to attack other players, yet not be attacked by players larger than myself"
HOWEVER, I could start to try and redefine and blur the lines. I could ask, define "attack"?
|
|
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:19 |
|
Anything that involves another player and military units. Not counting diplomacy attacks.
|
|
"FYI - if you had any balls you'd be posting under your in-game name." - KP
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:21 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Jude: Do you
honestly expect
anyone to believe you were o' so starry-eyed inquiring as to whether TD speaks for the coalition.
Lets call that one rhetorical.
|
Since I was inquiring, I would expect any rational non trolling individual to at least recognise it was an inquiry.
Would you clarify rhetorical? I take it to mean that yes, TD was speaking on your behalf.
You may of course redefine the word. Either way, you are still avoiding the question.
Actually two questions, but let me try and make this simple for you.
Was H? attacking VALAR because they harbored two players accused of being trolls, myself and ATH?
I await your long winded, trolling and evasive non-answer.
Edited by StJude - 30 Sep 2011 at 22:22
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:33 |
Tordenkaffen wrote:
Anything that involves another player and military units. Not counting diplomacy attacks. |
Nah Torden, sorry I was trying to make a point. I will let the diplomat one slide given our history :P
Retaliation is expected. My objections are this.
1.) I would prefer players not beat up on players significantly smaller than them militarily. i.e. Declare they will wipe them to 0 pop.
I don't have the pop size however to enforce that opinion.
2.) Players like Amroth, Lorre and Lawn (simply because it wrecks my head trying to spell it like a welshman) put on their big boy panties and not go sociopathic in game when a player mouths off to them.
|
|
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:33 |
StJude wrote:
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Jude: Do you
honestly expect
anyone to believe you were o' so starry-eyed inquiring as to whether TD speaks for the coalition.
Lets call that one rhetorical.
|
Since I was inquiring, I would expect any rational non trolling individual to at least recognise it was an inquiry.
|
No you weren't and that's why they didn't.
StJude wrote:
Was H? attacking VALAR because they harbored two players accused of being trolls, myself and ATH? |
In a simplified answer: partly.
StJude wrote:
I await your long winded, trolling and evasive non-answer. |
Didn't you get that hug?
|
|
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:39 |
StJude wrote:
Tordenkaffen wrote:
Anything that involves another player and military units. Not counting diplomacy attacks. |
Nah Torden, sorry I was trying to make a point. I will let the diplomat one slide given our history :P
Retaliation is expected. My objections are this.
1.) I would prefer players not beat up on players significantly smaller than them militarily. i.e. Declare they will wipe them to 0 pop.
I don't have the pop size however to enforce that opinion.
2.) Players like Amroth, Lorre and Lawn (simply because it wrecks my head trying to spell it like a welshman) put on their big boy panties and not go sociopathic in game when a player mouths off to them.
|
back to the valar reaching out part or how this thread is named you have made ur own thread for the above things go place it there please!
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:41 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
No you weren't and that's why they didn't.
|
Seriously? You are a mentalist now and have the ability to prove intention? Sheesh.
U! NO U! U! NO U!.....ad infinitum (Latin, HEY LOOK AT ME!)
Take it how you will then, seemed pretty clear to me and I bet others too.
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
In a simplified answer: partly.
|
Good Lord that was like Water from a Rock. Even Job himself would have been denied entry into the promised land over that one.
Fair answer, I should have added "partly" too.
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Didn't you get that hug?
|
I don't have arms.....oh, and I ate all the pies, so much so that hugging me is impossible without 30 to 40 long armed individuals on your side. Or in H?'s case, 5 or 6.
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:42 |
|
I second Lorre!
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568 |
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:52 |
Rill wrote:
I second Lorre! |
By Lorre's logic you should have started your own thread to voice your agreement.
I will say this thread has been helpful for me, and I am sure many others as to some of the real motives behind this war.
Would you be willing to answer the same question posed to Llyorn and H? on behalf of mCrows?
|
|
Tweet
VALAR seeking terms