| Author |
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 00:20 |
|
Constant? About 48 hours worth. Anything like the constant stream of attacks
without declaration that you mention in your second paragraph? I guess we just have to agree that the definition of constant is not a constant.
Someone else said we sent a siege at you in their post. I want everyone to understand that that did not happen.
No one in TVM has ever said we "had never done anything to deserve an attack on (our) seige." Show me where we said that and I will accept the truth of it. Saying it, don't make it so.
I never stated your troops did not die in the field before this declaration. You are obviously seeing what you want to see, not actually reading my statements. Here is what I said: "I am criticizing the fact that the same sort of actions we took previously did not warrant a declaration. Only WHEN YOUR TROOPS DIED IN THE FIELD IN AN ATTACK FROM US did you do that." (Caps for highlight)
How is a declaration of war, publicly posted on Global Chat by the System (every one of them is) "under the radar?"
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
 |
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 00:46 |
|
oh yeah, well i hear eagles poop in the air, its prob u that did on my windshield and tmv means too much verbage! oh wait thats pigeon poop and ur alliance is tvm....nevermind..may the fight continue on the playing field...good luck to both of yas!
|
 |
The Duke
Forum Warrior
Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Location: Indiana Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 02:08 |
abstractdream wrote:
Rill wrote:
Let's note here that Bonfyr Verboo of TVM and Wilberforce of N are alts. There is nothing secret about this. Wilberforce was involved in the war through N.
Bonfyr Verboo and Abraxox, who are friends in real life, dragged their former alliance, TLR, into a war on behalf of an alt. (Through for example sieges on Dwarven Druids.)
The Duke of Shade objected to this behavior, and their alliance leader, Eternal Fire, did not support it.
In response, Bonfyr Verboo and Abraxox took a group of their followers from TLR to form Trivium, leaving their former TLR alliance mates to face the consequences of their actions. Which, to his credit, Eternal Fire did, and has earned my respect in so doing.
Trivium has been at war with Consone since before it was even formed. They have reinforced sieges on Consone members and launched their own sieges at times. EE has decided to recognize these actions with a declaration of war.
In describing the flow of history as I understand it, I am not making judgments (except for my increased respect for Eternal Fire, as noted). But let's call a spade a spade.
|
All true except: Eternal Fire declared War on Shade. Shade simply launched feints and blockades assuming EF would contact them and they could talk (EF had ignored The Duke's messages, thus an escallation ensued.) EF acted on impulse and "dragged" TLR into a war in which it was clearly outmatched. I had no idea The Duke was trying to talk to and being ignored by EF. THAT was the last in a long line of poor decisions that forced me out. The members followed me. They did not remain behind to "face the consequences."
EDIT: Oh, and by the way, I did not launch without authorization while in TLR, ever. |
This is about the most accurate recount of what happened in the war. Spot on actually. Shade had a vested interest in a few things at the time and I repeatedly tried to contact EF but to no avail. I then sent approx 5 members (picked at random) who were active(confirmed via illy tools) a mail stating if they left TLR then they would not be targeted. Bonfyr and I then began side negotiations in which I showed him my efforts to end this before it escalated to an all out war even after war had been declared. This had all been given a deaf ear. The seige and attacks from TLR came after war was declared- so I would venture to say it was given the consent of the leadership whom declared the war. After those that chose to leave left we proceeded with seiges and attacks that had already been sent, and formed a new game plan. There were even seiges on trivium that were landed and not recalled by Shade.
To leave this as short as possible I state these facts not because I side with one or the other- but because I can attest to the fact even in a state of war and with catapults outside his alliance mates cities Bonfyr has remained honest. This is something I can admire especially with all the mud-slinging going around with this war. I told him from the beginning when he contacted me I would be honest with him even if we were enemies and he treated me with the same respect.
This being said stating he is contradicting and a liar is a farce.
Best of Luck to the Eagles and Trivium
|
|
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
|
 |
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 02:54 |
|
that a declaration of war, serving only to formalise a state of hostility already plainly known by both sides, can provoke this amount of spin...who is it that the respective sides think they're influencing at this late date, i wonder.
|
 |
Sajreth
Greenhorn
Joined: 24 Apr 2011 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 74 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 05:40 |
|
So basically in six pages I get this.... the thread started as a war declaration from one alliance whos confed was being militarily harassed by another alliance. in defense I see the following paraphrased of course:
"We were in an alliance that was at war, didn't like how it was handled and quit to start up an alliance to avoid hostilities"
"We do not deny being militarily involved in hostilities against an alliance that is confed with the alliance that declared war"
"We feel that we could attack one individual member of an alliance, but since we did not intend to attack other members, we would expect a well established alliance to turn a blind eye on our actions"
What I get out of this as a whole is it's quite a miracle it took this long for someone to declare!
|
|
|
 |
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 09:50 |
Sajreth wrote:
So basically in six pages I get this.... the thread started as a war declaration from one alliance whos confed was being militarily harassed by another alliance. |
Well, no. Not according to Hathaldir's original post. In his original post he stated the reason was that we attacked their siege. Later he added the Confed loyalty stuff. Later.
Sajreth wrote:
in defense I see the following paraphrased of course:
"We were in an alliance that was at war, didn't like how it was handled and quit to start up an alliance to avoid hostilities" |
We didn't leave to avoid hostilities, we left to avoided certain death (or as you put it, because we didn't like how it was handled.) Have you seen the size of Shade? Our former leader did not seem to care about us, so we left.
Sajreth wrote:
"We do not deny being militarily involved in hostilities against an alliance that is confed with the alliance that declared war" |
Right. Not denying it now. Never have denied it. Thanks for understanding.
Sajreth wrote:
"We feel that we could attack one individual member of an alliance, but since we did not intend to attack other members, we would expect a well established alliance to turn a blind eye on our actions" |
Actually, no. I expected Druids to do much more than they did. They did enough, though. We couldn't get the job done on our own. However, they never did declare war against us. Go figure.
Sajreth wrote:
What I get out of this as a whole is it's quite a miracle it took this long for someone to declare! |
I agree. Based on Hathaldir's statements they should have done so as soon as TVM was founded. We were attacking their Confederate then. It's just that they did not have a vested interest in our actions at the time, whatever that interest is. I can think of no other reason, as all the criteria existing over the last few days existed then.
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
 |
scaramouche
Forum Warrior
Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 432 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 17:06 |
[QUOTE=abstractdream]
We didn't leave to avoid hostilities, we left to avoided certain death (or as you put it, because we didn't like how it was handled.) Have you seen the size of Shade? Our former leader did not seem to care about us, so we left.
well this makes complete sense to me..you were worried about getting involved in a war with shade cos of their size..yet you attack an alliance thats even bigger...huhuh!
more like you thought you could get away with it cos EE were tied up fighting other alliances...but you knew shade could devote all their attention on you...thats why you panicked.
Edited by scaramouche - 21 Jan 2013 at 17:08
|
|
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
 |
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 550 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 17:38 |
abstractdream wrote:
We didn't leave to avoid hostilities, we left to avoided certain death (or as you put it, because we didn't like how it was handled.) Have you seen the size of Shade? Our former leader did not seem to care about us, so we left.
|
While this thread has been amusing to be read through for some time, I'll step in right here. A word of note to all, delivering propaganda was one of the first things you learned in TLR for leadership purposes, using it to defend the executive branch whenever possible and blame some other party IE "Fromfrak's crusade on Gemleys mine".
So in actuality, the war with Duke would never have been avoided, This fellow right here kept pressuring me to declare war on druids "This will be TLR's way to advance itself in the community", Bonfyr bypassed my military functions by telling my military squad leaders to inform him and not the military leader on their todo's, he was in contact with Nightbringers themselves debating on a coup on TLR ( we had sitting rights on each other and the others alts). Sure enough a NC player wipes TLR sieges on shade, N refuses to help the ex ally TLR and the glorious messiah Bonfyr and his disciples escape through the red sea of digital blood to the promised land in Trivum all the while promising all TLR members at that time that I would send chariots after them in revenge.
I'm sure that will be dissected fully, but thats more or less the case. TVM meant to continue hostilities that originated in TLR.
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
 |
deorasandeep
New Poster
Joined: 17 Sep 2012 Location: lucknow,india Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 18:20 |
abstractdream wrote:
Without declaring war on us you attacked our siege on a VALAR city, one of your Confederates. In my opinion, doing that without a declaration was fine. Siege breaking is a time honored tradition here in Illyriad. It was annoying to loose thirty thousand plus troops AFTER the city fell but we don't feel ONLY attacking armies in the field is an act of war. Guess we were wrong.
|
without declaring a war you went to sieze a valar city and expect
others to declare war first
Just wanted to know why sieze a VALAR city in between war under what circumstances did you think that fit. and the after that you deemed fit to declare war on VALAR
YOU DID ALL THAT SEEMED RIGHT TO YOU and now what EE thinks and did is wrong
You are great
DEORA
Edited by deorasandeep - 21 Jan 2013 at 18:36
|
 |
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 21 Jan 2013 at 20:52 |
deorasandeep wrote:
abstractdream wrote:
Without declaring war on us you attacked our siege on a VALAR city, one of your Confederates. In my opinion, doing that without a declaration was fine. Siege breaking is a time honored tradition here in Illyriad. It was annoying to loose thirty thousand plus troops AFTER the city fell but we don't feel ONLY attacking armies in the field is an act of war. Guess we were wrong.
|
without declaring a war you went to sieze a valar city and expect
others to declare war first
Just wanted to know why sieze a VALAR city in between war under what circumstances did you think that fit. and the after that you deemed fit to declare war on VALAR
|
No. We declared war on VALAR before the siege.
You are another of the uninformed, seeing what you wish, asking no real questions, judging from afar. If you don't care to look at the whole picture, you are blind to the truth.
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
 |