| Author |
|
Myr
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 May 2011 Location: Orlando, FL Status: Offline Points: 437 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 15:28 |
Brids17 wrote:
abstractdream wrote:
You constantly (the use of that word is a bit much but since you guys killed so much more of ours than we did of yours, I figured I could use it as well) attacked our siege and refused to declare war. I don't see a difference. |
Are you kidding? If someone punched you, that's assault. If you punch them back, that's self defense. Two entirely different things. You can't send a siege against someone and then when they retaliate and criticize you for it, call them hypocrites. And for the record, I think they're letting you guys off pretty easy, even if their hands are tied due to the war. If you tried the same stunt with mCrow you'd have a lot more to worry about than a war declaration and a forum post.
|
Trivium is at war with Valar and had a siege up. EE attacked that siege.
EE is at war with Dlords and had a siege up. Trivium attacked that siege.
Why is the second one so much worse than the first one? They look pretty similar to me.
|
 |
Mandarins31
Forum Warrior
Joined: 05 Jun 2010 Status: Offline Points: 418 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 15:34 |
abstractdream wrote:
Without declaring war on us you attacked our siege on a VALAR city, one of your Confederates. In my opinion, doing that without a declaration was fine. |
Indeed, you have to expect alliances of a same side in a war to help each others.
abstractdream wrote:
Siege breaking is a time honored tradition here in Illyriad. [...] we don't feel ONLY attacking armies in the field is an act of war. Guess we were wrong. |
I thought exactly the same, but H? declared war against VIC and Absa because they broke a siege; they were "ONLY attacking armies in the field". Apparently we both are wrong, Abstractdream.
If you're neutral and want to respect this tradition, you should send units towards any siege, not regarding who owns the siege. If you focus your attacks against only one side you naturally will be considered as an ennemy by this side.
|
 |
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 15:35 |
|
remember this is a silly game
|
 |
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1269 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 15:36 |
Myr wrote:
Trivium is at war with Valar and had a siege up. EE attacked that siege.
EE is at war with Dlords and had a siege up. Trivium attacked that siege.
Why is the second one so much worse than the first one? They look pretty similar to me.
|
I suppose everything is a blur for Myr, but I have marked the worst part (and the first part) in bold.
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 15:49 |
Ander wrote:
Myr wrote:
Trivium is at war with Valar and had a siege up. EE attacked that siege.
EE is at war with Dlords and had a siege up. Trivium attacked that siege.
Why is the second one so much worse than the first one? They look pretty similar to me.
|
I suppose everything is a blur for Myr, but I have marked the worst part (and the first part) in bold.
|
I see that the GregoRokin school of "insult someone in your posts while pretending to make sense" is expanding.
Nice manners guys, the "jolly yet trigger happy hippy" act is really amusing.
|
 |
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1269 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 16:04 |
Deranzin wrote:
I see that the GregoRokin school of "insult someone in your posts while pretending to make sense" is expanding.
Nice manners guys, the "jolly yet trigger happy hippy" act is really amusing.
|
I was replying to Myr. I thought she was deliberately ignoring the real reason that led to the war declaration. My remark was about that.
Grego is nowhere in this thread, and yet you drag his name only to insult him. I need not elaborate whose school is "insult
someone in your posts
while pretending to make sense
".
And you teach manners. Not at all amusing.
Edited by Ander - 20 Jan 2013 at 16:04
|
 |
Elmindra
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 16:04 |
I would add to this as well if possible. The player reference whom is a friend is Fromfrak, who was in TLR. I have defended many a siege on fellow Druids members in the north, and every single siege was reinforced by members of TLR who now comprise Trivium.
Don't pretend that you only had a dog in this fight because of a loss of troops on a siege on Valar. You have been in this fight before Trivium was even formed, so what exactly do you expect to happen.
|
 |
Abraxox
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Jan 2012 Location: San Antonio, TX Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 16:27 |
HATHALDIR wrote:
Tivium have constantly attacked seiges that we are performing and refuse to declare war, we will do so to make sure everyone knows what the stakes are. This is merely a simple announcement, try not to run away with yourselves! |
To be accurate, let's deal with facts. TRIVIUM is a new, fairly small alliance, comprised mostly of smaller players. A couple of TRIVIUM members
(mock and trivialize all you wish if it makes you feel better about yourself) attempted to assist Fromfrak, a former alliance member from TLR who asked for help against blockades. This was after EE member Haller wiped out thousands of our troops, an action that Hathaldir didn't even know about until I brought it to his attention. And now, it is from this situation that Trivium has
constantly attacked sieges
(liberties taken to correct spelling). I have a different understanding of what the word "constantly" actually implies.
Yesterday, I had a neighbor to neighbor communication with a member of EE regarding an unrelated matter, and Trivium's minor assistance of Fromfrak was mentioned. As a result, I forwarded the Battle Reports showing major interference against us by Haller (in an operation which we were involved in due to a blood-debt to one who saved our players during TLR's final conflict.) I also forwarded copies of these communications to Hathaldir. I thought the issue had been settled.
Rather than attempting to communicate with civility, which I attempted to do yesterday by politely bringing Haller's actions to the attention of Hathaldir through IGMs, today Hathaldir has decided to "send a message" via a Declaration of War. He later decided to back-rationalize that he did so because of confederation. I'm sure that EE could probably murder Trivium, given the size difference and player levels, but I certainly cannot quietly abide the casual manner in which war has been declared upon TVM under false pretenses, attempting to malign our reputation through inflammatory rhetoric.
I don't know whether anyone will actually care about the truth of this situation, but I feel the need to make sure that it is at least an option. This type of behavior is too reminiscent of the reasons for which the members of Trivium recently broke away from TLR. Trivium has not constantly attacked EE sieges, and I guarantee that no one can produce Battle Reports which indicate otherwise. Trivium has been content to live peacefully next to our EE neighbors, and it saddens me that Hathaldir has decided to declare an unjustifiable war. I have to deal with enough real-life violence through my work, and I dread unnecessary conflicts within Illyriad. I can only speak for myself on the following, but I have no intention of committing acts of aggression against my EE neighbors, despite what their leader is trying to instigate.
Edited by Abraxox - 20 Jan 2013 at 16:37
|
|
|
 |
Elmindra
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 16:41 |
No and No Abraxox. Number 1, you sieged a confed so expect for that siege to be attacked. Anything different would be idiotic and I refuse to believe you are that dumb. Number 2, Trivium itself may be a new alliance but you have been assisting in offensive sieges to "help" your friend Fromfrak since the beginning of the war. Your members in Trivium helped raze a number of Druids towns in Ursor while they were still in TLR. If you were truly content to live in peace alongside EE you would not be involved in military action.
You come on these forums crying foul when you have been the aggressor. Don't cry pity me when you are declared upon.
Edited by Elmindra - 20 Jan 2013 at 16:52
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 20 Jan 2013 at 16:52 |
Ander wrote:
Grego is nowhere in this thread, and yet you drag his name only to insult him.
|
No, I am just stating a fact. Since when stating FACTS is an insult in your dictionary .?.
Also, making fun of a FACT is not an insult, last time I checked a dictionary ...
Ander wrote:
I need not elaborate whose school is "insult
someone in your posts
while pretending to make sense
".
And you teach manners. Not at all amusing.
|
Yes, in fact you need to elaborate because unlike your leader's case where I can find a heap of posts where he insults me (in the same off-hand manner you copied), you will be hard pressed to find even one of my posts where I insulted anyone.
Just a small matter of FACTS you see, so maybe it is nothing for you to be really worried about ...
I don't know whether anyone will actually care about the truth of this situation, but I feel the need to make sure that it is at least an option. This type of behavior is too reminiscent of the reasons for which the members of Trivium recently broke away from TLR. |
I think many people playing the game do care about what is going on within it, so worry not, despite some funny bickering (sorry about my part in that btw, but it is so funny ! ) people are reading this topic and they are forming their opinions.
|
 |