| Author |
|
tansiraine
Wordsmith
Joined: 14 Oct 2012 Location: pensacola FL Status: Offline Points: 172 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 02:22 |
|
hmmm well that was some light reading for the night... anyways all it is doing is rehashing the same thing over and over again with the same certain people.
Honestly how the war started does not matter any more it is started.
What should matter is how it will end.
Now if people want to hold on the the old thoughts, beliefs and attitudes the war will continue.
Insulting each other get you no where neither does complaining. Every leader knows what the terms are to end the war.
Personally I think they should look at this way Is the pride of the leaders worth the people that are in their alliance continuing to get hurt. They are a leader do what is best for all the members and if that means you have to surrender so be it.
Also i wanted to address something that was said earlier For those that are not aware I know in H? we are not attacking just anyone that is red. H? has shown mercy to those that have asked for it.
I am really tired of the few loud mouths around that slander H? but we are the first ones called in when there is a issue.
I am H? I get messages weekly sometimes Daily with newbies that need help that are being attacked but players that are 25k ad above pop. yes GC helps.. but even when i started a year and a half ago I was told H? does not tolerate new players being bullied. I am active in GC maybe that is why I am contacted. but I am really getting annoyed at the people that want to bad mouth H? but i do not see them stepping up and helping the new players in need.
|
 |
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 04:09 |
Grego wrote:
***
So for you breaking sieges of allied cities is just cause for starting large scale war and sieging even more accounts which never participated in any hostility? |
Yes. Not only Yes. But DUH! Yes.
Grego wrote:
Let me remind you what was our bullying: *** |
|
 |
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 05:45 |
Grego wrote:
Let me remind you what was our bullying: one player sent army to allied mine two squares from allied city, and announced it five days before arrival. Occupant broke agreement and didn't withdraw on time. Apart that mine square there was no hostility from our side against anyone, military or diplo.
|
You persist in looking only at the single straw that finally ended the camel without considering the many bales loaded previously. Maybe you should try to widen your viewpoint.
|
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
 |
Teets
Greenhorn
Joined: 04 Jan 2013 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 06:26 |
Rill wrote:
I do believe that some participants in this war are trying to have their cake and eat it too -- proclaiming that they seek positive aims when in fact their goal is to beat up on other people. It is the disingenuous posturing that I find most distasteful. |
I agree. I have been playing for just over a month but I have read all the forum posts on this subject and have seen many, many discussions in GC about the war.
From a outsider's [noob's] view, it seems like a bully picking on a bully for being a bully. I've seen this same behavior on many other online games.
Edited by Teets - 14 Feb 2013 at 06:27
|
 |
EvilKatia
Forum Warrior
Joined: 30 Jun 2012 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 210 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 06:30 |
Hadus wrote:
EvilKatia wrote:
Well I think you got what he said wrong Hadus : no matter what he says it wont really stop the war or change it.
Same for what I say or what you say or what unnivolved others say.
It is up to those at war to decide to end it or not to.
That doesn't mean nothing interesting get said or that you won't have interesting conversation.
It just mean that its not very probable anything that get said here (on this thread or the next one to be created ) will change the course of the war or will get the feuding alliances to make peace.
|
Well, that's certainly part of it, and I agree. Our opinions mean very little and can do very little when we are outside the scope of the conflict. But scottfitz seemed to be using that as rationale for not posting at all, based on his quote, which I don't agree on.
|
Well I would think on this specific subject he is probably right, on others more input would be needed/appreciated.
Bbut this war thing has had so many thread that usually end all in the same way : no one can agree and/or Luna has to close it and edit some post and it erm....degenerate.
They are some very interesting posts in there followed by many re-affirmations, grumbling, bits of role playing and then rinse and repeat lol
Not to mention when it get derailed lol
|
|
Kat
'They have to always turn a forum post into a badly written book that gives a headache and takes your iq points' - AO
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 07:36 |
The_Dude wrote:
Deranzin wrote:
****
Pretty basic/obvious stuff for any organisation of people comprized by more than 3 people and I am still amazed how Consone considers itself as an actual confederation without even the most basic forms of communication and common ground between its leaders.
****
|
Well, Consone has a HUGE organizational advantage over Coalition - I hear they have a Consone Chat Channel.
|
They do .?.
Grego wrote:
"Deranzin"
Sorry, I am no soldier, and as usual I got lost reading your post somewhere between those
boldedwords. Could you please simplify your observations for me, so I can understand it too. What is real difference between Coalition and Consone?
|
I have written all those things repeatedly, both in extended and short versions and you never seem to understand. You are obviously intelligent so I cannot suppose that this is real, but just a diverting/stalling tactic so someone will eventually make a verbal blunder which will give you a chance to totally ignore that post and toss the ball out of the field, like you did a couple of posts ago by taking the word "platoon" out of two fairly sized posts and warping everything around it.
So, I'll post the reply in a list, without any explanation (where you will claim that it is of course unfounded, and if I reply in a lengthly way you will claim that it is incomprehensible, once again, but hey, I find such behaviours funny so I'll humor you again
 ), but in observations so that my point will be obvious :
- Consone has rules for its members, but noone to enforce those rules on them in case people abuse their own rules. Consone do not administer their confed, they "suggest" stuff.
- Consone, at least here, does not seem to have a collective opinion or at least a concensus (let alone an actual policy) on BASIC STUFF like whether the war is causing them any damage and whether more players are leaving the game because of it, than in peacetime. Seeing members of the leadership of Consone alliances contradict each other in the same thread/matter is not a rare sight at all.
- Consone does not have a definite hierarchy.
- Consone has no officials to take centralized decisions and where people can adress their issues. Instead every problem you have with its members you have to deal with the individual leaders of the member alliances who can seemingly drag the whole of Consone in every which way they want.
and those are just the major flaws in the design ... I could go into finer detail, but then you'd claim that what I say is both incomrehensible AND unfounded
 ... soooooo :
tl;dr : Consone does not administer its members and is just one step over a mob only due to the pre-existence of the individual alliance's administration schemes. But with no superimposing hierarchy to supervise and coordinate that loosely conected and largely independend infrastructure, there is no real leadership. And, to paraphrase that old commercial "no leadership, no party"
|
 |
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2224 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 08:28 |
|
Not to contradict you, Deranzin, but even if Consone had some sort of singular leadership, or if they delegated such, they would be still disfunctional. The bottom line is that this group of alliance leaders that started Soup to dominate the server are either leaving, were not included in the initial conversations (and therefore rightfully indignant), or are trying to continue to hold the wool over their members' eyes.
The simple fact is that a group of folks decided to join together to try to be the dominant power in Elgea. There is nothing nefarious about that. It is common in every game. They did it and then it became the worst thing you could imagine. The power group (Consone) which had a far higher population than either the Crows or the H? Coalition telling folks what to do. And the problem was, when people tried to deal with these folks, they got the response: "we are part of Consone, you'd better do it, or else...".
Crows never had that problem. H's Confeds never had that problem.
So... The problem continuued and persisted and persisted and it became patently clear that this Mega Coalition that was far in excess in size of either the Crows or the H? Coalition would basically allow its disparate members to act in pretty horrible ways with no repercussions. What would Illy become then? A field of folks who are bullies who only have to say "I'm part of Consone" to get what they want?
So, when push came to shove, Consone pushed again, and, to their utmost surprise (they were used to no resistance), someone pushed back...
I do not doubt that Consone had zero interest in engaging H? in a war when they did. I'm absolutely sure they thought they would grow to 3 or 4 times the H? Coalition size before doing that. That was the plan. After burying the dissenters in more players/population/troops than H? (or anyone else) could ever field, Consone would be left as the de facto Illy standard.
The problem is that other people don't necessarily like to lie down and subject themselves to your vision. Even if H? hadn't stood up, I'm sure others would have.
The bottom line is that Consone had a vision of making this game their own, we got to see some of the ramifications of that vision, and many, many people (including tons of folks who are not in this war) believe it is a very good thing that your vision is not being realized.
So... There are lots of folks in Consone that I personally like and how great they are is really not the issue here. Let us put to bed, once and for all, the Illy Forum Debate.
The Coalition will never negotiate in these Forums. Ever. So stop trying.
We have decided to negotiate in the H? Forums. If you do not know how to do that, then please contact Starry in game. Most of you are already registered.
If you choose to make statements about this war and how The Coalition are being tough, or hurting you, or unfair, we will not respond. You are getting your just deserts in our book.
There will never, ever, be a Forum negotiated or discussed peace between and Consone Member Alliance and The Coalition.
On the other hand, The Coalition has been incredibly lenient with some allies of Consone who have wished to leave the war. We may continue to be so at our discretion. But "first come first serve" does come to mind.
In summary, unless you want a long, dreary, drawn out experience of losing your cities, I suggest you contact us in the H? Forums.
Obviously, as we have shown with the several alliances who have come to terms to date, we have been exceedingly nice and lenient. So there is a definite advantage to being earlier rather than later.
But, if you choose to espouse the principles of the folks who got you into this, then, by all means, we shall oblige you...
Edited by Kumomoto - 14 Feb 2013 at 08:47
|
 |
Ossian
Forum Warrior
Joined: 12 Oct 2010 Status: Offline Points: 456 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 10:53 |
^^ Reading Kumomoto's post above is astonishing. Nowhere have I read, heard or seen anything which remotely indicates that Consone was established to dominate the server.
The initial statement of Consone seems to indiciate the opposite as does almost all subsequent posts.
Including posts, I might add, from players who have left the game because of this War!.
It neither helps H?, the Coaliton and not even the game to keep proposing such poorly constructed propaganda as Kumomoto's lastest post.
Kumo you should wake up and smell the coffee. Consone want peace! Illyriad want peace not slurs and propaganda.
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 11:55 |
Ossian wrote:
^^ Reading Kumomoto's post above is astonishing. Nowhere have I read, heard or seen anything which remotely indicates that Consone was established to dominate the server.
The initial statement of Consone seems to indiciate the opposite as does almost all subsequent posts.
Including posts, I might add, from players who have left the game because of this War!.
|
If you judge people solely by their words, you'd find out that we live in a world of saints, happy puppies and where money exists aplenty for all and is being handed out by the rich in a "big rock candy mountain" fashion ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYGCpGzFWh0 ).
Consone want peace!
|
And Kumomoto told them exactly where to find/seek it ... Consone, up till now according to most of their posts, wants peace to land from the sky like manna in the desert, but we all know that such miracles do not happen every day.
So, they know where to go to negotiate peace and until they do all those hippy-dippy peace cries sound hypocritical and/or funny ... especially coming from someone like you who abandoned his account and tries to troll the forums hidding behind the mask of his old nickname
|
 |
Grego
Postmaster
Joined: 09 May 2010 Location: Klek Status: Offline Points: 729 |
Posted: 14 Feb 2013 at 15:01 |
|
I'll speak only for Absa:
In whole our time we never tried to enforce our domination. Minor disputes with neighbours were quickly resolved on mutual benefit until we got caught in your planned trap. Just look what happened with Rhyagelle after you used them for your purpose. We may not like war as you do but will never accept your shameless extortion, so we will keep on fighting. No mercy is expected, we protest only against your spins.
|
 |