Subscription fee? |
Post Reply  |
Page <1234> |
| Author | |
Ficho 
Greenhorn   Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Location: Split, Croatia Status: Offline Points: 85 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply  Posted: 03 Sep 2014 at 09:16 |
|
Appreciated gentlemen, fellow gamers!
Do not throw your words in the wind.
The topic was opened three months ago.
A few topics on the forum opened to the same goal.
Have you read at least one review on all this with the developers or those who feel that way?
You are not. They catch "dirty" words and punish the children who gave themselves a little more freedom in the chat.
For everything else, and so far, will take the players themselves. If it is really necessary to go to war and we will work these bills. And in war, we know, selling prestige crown still going well.
Sincerely
Ficho
336 players online
Edited by Ficho - 03 Sep 2014 at 09:33 |
|
 |
|
| Angrim
Postmaster General   Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 03 Sep 2014 at 17:55 |
|
|
|
|
| Dungshoveleux
Postmaster  Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 03 Sep 2014 at 19:29 |
|
If people hate sat accounts then charging prestige for time limited sitting would be the answer IMHO.
People moan about the lack of development and praise the lack of a pay-to-win ethos, but sadly these two things are linked. Paying money will increase the development activity beyond bug fixes.
|
|
|
|
| Captain Kindly
Forum Warrior   Joined: 19 Aug 2011 Location: Fremorn Status: Offline Points: 276 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 03 Sep 2014 at 21:05 |
|
Angrim's suggestion is a better one, Dung.
The bigger part of the alliances benefiting from permasats are sitting on a huge load of alliance prestige, which can be allocated to and used by the sitters.
The sittees (is that a word? If not it is now
 ) do not have that benefit.
Edited by Captain Kindly - 03 Sep 2014 at 21:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Zakathan
New Poster   Joined: 14 Feb 2014 Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Sep 2014 at 01:07 |
|
What if you made the subscription bring along with it some benefits? I've seen other MMOs give a certain amount of virtual currency when you subscribe. How about 25% more prestige than what the comparable amount in cash would be, along with making the account already have prestige status.
That way, it's still technically F2P, but there is added incentive for those that do use prestige to spend on a more consistent basis. I also agree that perhaps more "automated" (but obviously not Pay-to-Win) features needed to be added to Prestige accounts (so people like Rill pay up Wink).
Perma-sitting accounts need to be dealt with separately. Personally, I think there should be a limit to how many times someone can login using the sitter function (something like 90 days or 90 logins whichever comes first) before the account becomes abandoned. But that is another discussion.
|
|
|
|
| Ficho
Greenhorn Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Location: Split, Croatia Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Sep 2014 at 08:18 |
|
In my opinion (Mr. Riko likes it when I say this) in Illy is more accounts managed by another hand than regular ones. Broken Lands are the result of such a situation.
Accounts are talking about, and they are left to care for more than 45 days to be deleted, and the cities belonging to bid for prestige to interested alliances (only place).
Suggestion-New rule: "Player could not leave the account to sitter as a member of any alliance"
Sitting ACC, as well as the option of the game should be eliminated from the game, and at the worse allow for a period of 45 days.
Leaving the account does not hurt, believe me.
365 players online
Edited by Ficho - 04 Sep 2014 at 09:20 |
|
|
|
| Ficho
Greenhorn Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Location: Split, Croatia Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Sep 2014 at 12:59 |
|
Yesterday I sent 300 vans on harvesting (64 on sov. spots and almost of rest in 7 spot around city zone).
I usually did same every week.
Circle is about 400 spots around my cities.
No interrupting, no bumping.
Mr. Rikoo (or who is concerned), could you be so kind and make one review.
Thanks in advance.
Sincerely
Ficho
407 players online
WOW!
Edited by Ficho - 04 Sep 2014 at 13:15 |
|
|
|
| Brandmeister
Postmaster General  Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Sep 2014 at 15:07 |
|
Ficho, nobody harvests with caravans. And many people switch off GC.
|
|
|
|
| Ficho
Greenhorn Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Location: Split, Croatia Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Sep 2014 at 15:27 |
|
Brandmeister, i am not Greenhorn, as is noticed in my forum avatar.
:)
|
|
|
|
| Hora
Postmaster  Joined: 10 May 2010 Status: Offline Points: 839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Sep 2014 at 17:53 |
|
We know you have some experiance,... but so do other players.
I only do harvest, when my cities are really small, and the way to the next town is extremly long. In all the bigger towns harvesting is simply unnecessary, when the storage is overflowing anyway =)
As this is off topic, I'll make a try to do a return:
I really hope for some regulations based on a simple time limit for sitting. With no further excuses via buying prestige.
Yes I know about players having returned after lots of time, but as Ficho stated: rebuilding isn't too dramatic.
Edited by Hora - 04 Sep 2014 at 17:53 |
|
|
|
| Post Reply |
Page <1234> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Dungshoveleux wrote: