Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - SIN War Declaration Against SHARK
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

SIN War Declaration Against SHARK

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 17>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 6 Votes, Average 3.17   Topic Search Topic Search   Topic Options Topic Options
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote abstractdream Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 20:59
Originally posted by OrcDork OrcDork wrote:

Question:

Did SIN 1st stipulate what they want from SHARK in order to prevent an attack? Or was it an ' attack 1st, converse later' type of approach? 

Maybe SIN didn't stipulate terms 1st as they didn't want to allow SHARK a chance to stall and prepare for war (Not saying they didn't, just speculating).

Any ideas? 
Stipulating terms would have been both a waste of time and a strategic mistake.
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
Mr Damage View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Mr Damage Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 21:42
Here come the conspiracy theories.
Back to Top
Dungshoveleux View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 935
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Dungshoveleux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 22:18
@Brandmeister

I do not ever believe that wars are 1:1.
A great deal goes on behind the scenes with "help".
I don't necessarily have evidence this time, but saw enough in round 1 to convince me of this assertion.   I also note that Gateway contains most of TVM and is styled as "related to" (my words) SIN.   So there you go.
Back to Top
Dungshoveleux View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 935
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dungshoveleux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 22:21
**sigh**

If SIN really wanted peace, wouldn't they have tried to negotiate with a list of things they wanted to agree?  But it seems they just want to have a fight for the sake of it.  There are no valid strategic reasons or justifications - just a belief that they can dictate where people can and cannot settle.
Back to Top
Bulani View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 15 Sep 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Bulani Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 23:25
I believe that SIN like a lot of us believed the Newlands war was basically STOMP war 2.0 and therefore this is STOMP 3.0. There was no conspiracy or collusion as a lot of people are claiming. I know I was there. But people will believe what they want to believe, and now SHARK will have to deal with this.
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 00:23
@Bulani: It is a fair point that many TVM players have moved to GATE, and many STOMP players have moved to SHARK. I still think it's quite a stretch to call this STOMP 3.0.

@Dung: I don't fully understand your "behind the scenes" comment. While it's certainly possible to invisibly transfer gold and resources between alliances, isn't the actual roster completely transparent? Battle reports list all participants, so it doesn't seem possible to fight undetected. Except with magic and diplomats, but those are hardly lethal weapons compared to armies.

Likewise I don't understand your assertion that "there are no strategic reasons or justifications". People have quoted two of your leaders saying that Newlands was strategic and valuable to SHARK's long term objectives. You might disagree with them, but your own leaders felt justified in challenging TVM's land claim to secure an important area. Apparently your opponents also feel quite strongly about your presence there, enough to risk their cities against the #1 alliance. If you believe that the area isn't strategic, why focus on building there in the first place, despite regional hostilities, and why hold it now with such vigor?
Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abstractdream Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 02:05
Originally posted by Dungshoveleux Dungshoveleux wrote:

I do not ever believe that wars are 1:1.
A great deal goes on behind the scenes with "help".
I don't necessarily have evidence this time, but saw enough in round 1 to convince me of this assertion.
...round 1? Like this: 

[UPDATED] TVM-Intercepted Vans at Campagnolo Siege Reveal Pico’s Alt Supplied City From MOON??

Not only did MOON help SHARK (though, apparently without their knowledge and admittedly, they did the right thing and asked LePue to go) but so did SHRKr. I'm convinced SHARK believes they should be able to do anything they want and are surprised when called on it (verbally or otherwise).
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
KarL Aegis View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2010
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 287
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KarL Aegis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 04:16
Originally posted by abstractdream abstractdream wrote:

Originally posted by Dungshoveleux Dungshoveleux wrote:

I do not ever believe that wars are 1:1.
A great deal goes on behind the scenes with "help".
I don't necessarily have evidence this time, but saw enough in round 1 to convince me of this assertion.
...round 1? Like this: 

[UPDATED] TVM-Intercepted Vans at Campagnolo Siege Reveal Pico’s Alt Supplied City From MOON??

Not only did MOON help SHARK (though, apparently without their knowledge and admittedly, they did the right thing and asked LePue to go) but so did SHRKr. I'm convinced SHARK believes they should be able to do anything they want and are surprised when called on it (verbally or otherwise).

Next you're going to say that adding the leadership of Deathmongers to the ranks of The Hashashin to fight for The Hashashin is completely different and not in any way unfair. When you have the entire military force of another alliance backing you up you are not engaging in a one versus one scenario.
I am not amused.
Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abstractdream Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 04:41
So, you believe SHARK using outside help for getting resources was no different than a player or players joining an alliance? You also believe that both scenarios are unfair?
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
Arian View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 139
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Arian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 06:43
Originally posted by Dungshoveleux Dungshoveleux wrote:

@Brandmeister I also note that Gateway contains most of TVM and is styled as "related to" (my words) SIN.  So there you go.


I note that Gateway have not declared war, so I am uncertain what point you are trying to make or maybe Shark having SHRKr and their "after war was declared" confed TUF should count as well?

What I also noted on the day war was declared was that Sin had 37 members and Shark had 83.
As far as I can see Sin still have 37, Shark appear to have picked up a couple of extras...

I could maybe work up a good conspiracy theory about summoning aid for a one to one fight and trying to drag in other alliances but it wouldn't be Sin I'd be mentioning LOL

'Do you want ice with that?'
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 17>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.