SIN War Declaration Against SHARK |
Post Reply |
Page <1 23456 17> |
| Author | ||
abstractdream
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 20:59 |
|
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
Mr Damage
Postmaster Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 21:42 |
|
|
Here come the conspiracy theories.
|
||
![]() |
||
Dungshoveleux
Postmaster Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 22:18 |
|
|
@Brandmeister
I do not ever believe that wars are 1:1.
A great deal goes on behind the scenes with "help".
I don't necessarily have evidence this time, but saw enough in round 1 to convince me of this assertion.
I also note that Gateway contains most of TVM and is styled as "related to" (my words) SIN.
So there you go.
|
||
![]() |
||
Dungshoveleux
Postmaster Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 22:21 |
|
|
**sigh**
If SIN really wanted peace, wouldn't they have tried to negotiate with a list of things they wanted to agree? But it seems they just want to have a fight for the sake of it. There are no valid strategic reasons or justifications - just a belief that they can dictate where people can and cannot settle.
|
||
![]() |
||
Bulani
New Poster Joined: 15 Sep 2015 Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 23:25 |
|
|
I believe that SIN like a lot of us believed the Newlands war was basically STOMP war 2.0 and therefore this is STOMP 3.0. There was no conspiracy or collusion as a lot of people are claiming. I know I was there. But people will believe what they want to believe, and now SHARK will have to deal with this.
|
||
![]() |
||
Brandmeister
Postmaster General Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 00:23 |
|
|
@Bulani: It is a fair point that many TVM players have moved to GATE, and many STOMP players have moved to SHARK. I still think it's quite a stretch to call this STOMP 3.0.
@Dung: I don't fully understand your "behind the scenes" comment. While it's certainly possible to invisibly transfer gold and resources between alliances, isn't the actual roster completely transparent? Battle reports list all participants, so it doesn't seem possible to fight undetected. Except with magic and diplomats, but those are hardly lethal weapons compared to armies. Likewise I don't understand your assertion that "there are no strategic reasons or justifications". People have quoted two of your leaders saying that Newlands was strategic and valuable to SHARK's long term objectives. You might disagree with them, but your own leaders felt justified in challenging TVM's land claim to secure an important area. Apparently your opponents also feel quite strongly about your presence there, enough to risk their cities against the #1 alliance. If you believe that the area isn't strategic, why focus on building there in the first place, despite regional hostilities, and why hold it now with such vigor? |
||
![]() |
||
abstractdream
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 02:05 |
|
[UPDATED] TVM-Intercepted Vans at Campagnolo Siege Reveal Pico’s Alt Supplied City From MOON??
Not only did MOON help SHARK (though, apparently without their knowledge and admittedly, they did the right thing and asked LePue to go) but so did SHRKr. I'm convinced SHARK believes they should be able to do anything they want and are surprised when called on it (verbally or otherwise).
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
KarL Aegis
Forum Warrior Joined: 20 Aug 2010 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 287 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 04:16 |
|
Next you're going to say that adding the leadership of Deathmongers to the ranks of The Hashashin to fight for The Hashashin is completely different and not in any way unfair. When you have the entire military force of another alliance backing you up you are not engaging in a one versus one scenario.
|
||
|
I am not amused.
|
||
![]() |
||
abstractdream
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 04:41 |
|
|
So, you believe SHARK using outside help for getting resources was no different than a player or players joining an alliance? You also believe that both scenarios are unfair?
|
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
Arian
Wordsmith Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 08 Nov 2015 at 06:43 |
|
I note that Gateway have not declared war, so I am uncertain what point you are trying to make or maybe Shark having SHRKr and their "after war was declared" confed TUF should count as well? What I also noted on the day war was declared was that Sin had 37 members and Shark had 83. As far as I can see Sin still have 37, Shark appear to have picked up a couple of extras... I could maybe work up a good conspiracy theory about summoning aid for a one to one fight and trying to drag in other alliances but it wouldn't be Sin I'd be mentioning
|
||
|
'Do you want ice with that?'
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply |
Page <1 23456 17> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |