SIN War Declaration Against SHARK |
Post Reply  |
Page <12345 17> |
| Author | |
Steven Quincy Urpel 
Wordsmith   Joined: 06 May 2014 Location: OUTER (SPACE) Status: Offline Points: 117 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply  Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 06:48 |
|
Prices never went up in the wars I've been around for. Also, one would assume Sin and Shark know enough to not use boar spears in PvP.
|
|
|
They call me MISTER Urp!
|
|
 |
|
| jcx
Forum Warrior Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 09:22 |
|
Oh. this is interesting!
1v1 (Alliance vs Alliance) war is a good thing to watch. Rock on people!
/me grabs beer and watch the Illy world burn.
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
jcx in H? | orcboy in H? |
|
|
|
| Captain Kindly
Forum Warrior  Joined: 19 Aug 2011 Location: Fremorn Status: Offline Points: 276 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 09:35 |
Indeed.
If an alliance prepares for war, they usually stock up before that. Or have T2 resources stocked up in high number on principle. In tournaments it's a different case, but we all know the devs have become allergic to those...
Good luck to all, and I'm hoping the other big alliances can stop the urge to go stomping :)
But since this is Illy, somehow I doubt that will happen...
Edited by Captain Kindly - 07 Nov 2015 at 09:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
| OrcDork
New Poster   Joined: 23 Oct 2014 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 09:53 |
|
Question:
Did SIN 1st stipulate what they want from SHARK in order to prevent an attack? Or was it an ' attack 1st, converse later' type of approach?
Maybe SIN didn't stipulate terms 1st as they didn't want to allow SHARK a chance to stall and prepare for war (Not saying they didn't, just speculating).
Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
| jcx
Forum Warrior Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 10:33 |
|
at OrcDork, I think they will attack when they wanted too. :D
/me heard a lady warrior said - "She smells war! and it smells like a teen spirit."
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
jcx in H? | orcboy in H? |
|
|
|
| Brandmeister
Postmaster General   Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 13:34 |
Prices fell in both big wars. As armies increase in size, the value of gold increases. Thus the price of items appears to fall, because the items are priced in gold. |
|
|
|
| Dungshoveleux
Postmaster  Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 16:12 |
|
I'd agree that prices in general would fall as players liquidated holdings to generate cash to pay their armies.
|
|
|
|
| Dungshoveleux
Postmaster Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 16:14 |
|
Hi Mr OrcDork,
That is the 64k gold question.
All the blurb on the 1st page is just excuses.
I think they just want to fight and knock SHARK off the top slot for kudos (or vanity).
|
|
|
|
| Brandmeister
Postmaster General Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 16:34 |
|
Come on. How could they possibly knock Shark off the top slot? The leaderboard shows you have 812 cities. It doesn't seem likely that the #12 alliance could dislodge you from #1. If SIN accomplished that, it would be an incredible feat of military prowess.
|
|
|
|
| Granlik
Forum Warrior  Joined: 12 Apr 2012 Location: London UK Status: Offline Points: 280 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 20:07 |
|
I think Sin are just being honest and as one of the first to establish a land claim and feel it is a legitimate extension of Illy game play, now wish to show their objection to Shark who disagree with claims. They may also worry about Sharks statement that they have developed Newlands just because it is strategic area and foresee a further development later in the game into BL to widen their objective. |
|
|
|
| Post Reply |
Page <12345 17> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Steven Quincy Urpel wrote: