| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
bartimeus 
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Location: Right behind U
Status: Offline
Points: 222 |
 Posted: 28 Nov 2010 at 17:38 |
|
One godwin point for you sir...
|
|
Bartimeus, your very best friend.
|
 |
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853 |
Posted: 29 Nov 2010 at 04:35 |
 bartimeus wrote:
One godwin point for you sir... |
There are no points awarded for proving Godwins law.
|
|
G0DsDestroyer
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Location: Ásgarð/Vanaheim
Status: Offline
Points: 975 |
Posted: 29 Nov 2010 at 06:05 |
i'll give you a G0dwin point then
Edited by G0DsDestroyer - 29 Nov 2010 at 06:06
|
|
|
|
Dronthor
New Poster
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 12 |
Posted: 29 Nov 2010 at 12:34 |
Nokigon wrote:
[...]. My alliance, Dark Blight, are well known for being 'warmongorers' or however the hell you spell it, but we only attack unaffiliated players or those who have attacked us. What TMM is doing is different. [...] |
It completely escapes me, how attacking unaffiliated players is morally superior to TMM's war. Although I do not condone TMM's behaviour, at least they can claim to be playing somewhat within the theme of a war simulation game where there are provinces and factions. All TMM really is doing is saying "If you're not with us you're against us". Not a very sustainable diplomatic stance, but IMO better at any rate than saying "If you're easy prey, we'll eat you" That is what only attacking unaffiliated players amounts to.
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452 |
Posted: 29 Nov 2010 at 19:14 |
Dronthor wrote:
Nokigon wrote:
[...]. My alliance, Dark Blight, are well known for being 'warmongorers' or however the hell you spell it, but we only attack unaffiliated players or those who have attacked us. What TMM is doing is different. [...] |
It completely escapes me, how attacking unaffiliated players is morally superior to TMM's war. Although I do not condone TMM's behaviour, at least they can claim to be playing somewhat within the theme of a war simulation game where there are provinces and factions. All TMM really is doing is saying "If you're not with us you're against us". Not a very sustainable diplomatic stance, but IMO better at any rate than saying "If you're easy prey, we'll eat you" That is what only attacking unaffiliated players amounts to.
|
Well, I'm sorry, but we need someone to attack. By hitting unaffiliated players, we offend one person and get experience and resources. We also only attack those who have refused an invitation, and been insulting about it.
|
|
Kelis
New Poster
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 19 |
Posted: 11 Dec 2010 at 21:54 |
|
I voted 'other' because I am too new to understand all the issues here.
However, I would vote 'yes' if I could be assured that ALL diplomatic resolutions were tried first.
Kelis
|
|
Kelis
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 |
Posted: 12 Dec 2010 at 01:29 |
Is it ok If I say "Voting is Closed"?
It seems like this topic is no longer current. Or am I missing something?
|
|
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650 |
Posted: 12 Dec 2010 at 05:04 |
|
Voting is indeed closed, as of a few pages ago at least. With the war half-over, "whether we start one" is a ship beyond the horizon.
|
|
Tim
New Poster
Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1 |
Posted: 15 Dec 2010 at 14:58 |
|
I think that the whole alliance ranking system has made people over competitive , and also for the purpose of this conversation that I think no Harmless should stay out of this conflict as aren't they still fighting the black and white company's?
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483 |
Posted: 15 Dec 2010 at 20:24 |
Tim wrote:
I think that the whole alliance ranking system has made people over competitive , and also for the purpose of this conversation that I think no Harmless should stay out of this conflict as aren't they still fighting the black and white company's? |
WHITE is dead. Any active members of white left the alliance and BLACK is dead as well though, Good has most of those remaining BLACK members in it. I'm not sure if H? is still attacking them though, I was under the impression they got their revenge and moved on.
|
|
Tweet
Should Harmless get involved