| Author |
|
scaramouche
Forum Warrior
Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 432 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 18:53 |
Deranzin wrote:
scaramouche wrote:
Deranzin wrote:
Loud Whispers wrote:
Deranzin wrote:
- How did Roads get such a different deal - and much better - than the one you are talking about?
- How can you raze your own cities?
- What does "all gold" mean? How much is that?
- Define "insane amount."
- What on earth does "forswear friends and allies" mean exactly? Stop talking in 3 dollar drama book lingo please.
|
Instead of arguing semantics why not just ask for proof of these claims? It would be a great deal more productive. It would be refreshingly simple too, matching the reality to the conditions and seeing how much they differ or adhere.
|
they 'd better explain in more detail what they are talking about
|
this part sounds like a threat...although you probably meant it differently??
|
There is no need to be jumpy. Since when a phrase like "if you work in the field, you'd better wash you hands before eating" is a threat .?.
The logic is simple : If you are going to talk about such stuff in public, you'd better explain what you say instead of being vague for YOUR benefit.
Simple as that and obviously no threats involved.
sounds to me like no matter what people tell you what the demands were/are...you dont/wont believe them anyway, yet you still argue the toss...maybe you should ask your own leadership what the terms were/are..or do they keep you lot in the dark about this as well?
|
Well, since they seem to be bloating things totally out of proportion and Roads DID get a much better deal than what they describe, I think that we can all have the benefit of doubting what they claim till they get more to the point and do away with the drama, as I said to their benefit.
And no, I do not wish to ask my leadership ... I trust them to do their part and within what is reasonable, so I'd like to ask the other side if you do not mind.
|
Like I said you probably meant it differently ..:)...although thats how I first read it.
As i have also said ...you asked the opposition, they told you some of the terms but you dont accept what they say...why would they " bloat" things out of proportion? they have nothing to achieve from doing this...even our alliance had ludicrous terms from H?...but I suppose they were the start of terms and were (hopefully) up for discussion at the time it was mentioned.
I guess this thread has well and truly been hi-jacked, cos it seems most people are just going over the same stuff all over again.
|
|
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 20:02 |
scaramouche wrote:
As i have also said ...you asked the opposition, they told you some of the terms but you dont accept what they say...why would they " bloat" things out of proportion? they have nothing to achieve from doing this...
|
I do not say that I do not accept them ... I just asked for clarifications because they are totally vague and delivered more in a drama way, than in any countable manner.
And yes, they are trying to achieve in painting their opponents as totally unreasonable regarding the terms of peace (which is the topic). So, all I asked is some clarifications/details so that anyone can judge that for his own self.
|
 |
scaramouche
Forum Warrior
Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 432 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 20:20 |
HAH!...if anything your alliance should be paying Consone concessions and rewards for giving them a war..up to the start of this H? were bored of twiddling their thumbs waiting for some proper action other than the tournie...
|
|
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
 |
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 20:25 |
|
Lol. Scar
|
 |
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 21:03 |
 Scar!
|
 |
Daefis
Wordsmith
Joined: 05 Aug 2011 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 22:02 |
|
Truest comment so far Scar +1 :) lol
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 at 23:19 |
|
|
 |
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Posted: 09 Jan 2013 at 13:27 |
|
one way of achieving peace is to defeat the leaders of the opposition, shouldnt attacks to aimed at them exclusively? behead them all! anarchy...let chaos rule illyriad!
|
 |
belargyle
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Jun 2010 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 401 |
Posted: 09 Jan 2013 at 16:14 |
|
The problem is that as long as they stay (and we greatly desire them to), they will never be removed, only shrunk. Therefore that option isn't valid.. and additionally - there is no 'behead' option in the military aspect either.. yet.
Edited by belargyle - 09 Jan 2013 at 16:16
|
 |
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Posted: 09 Jan 2013 at 20:01 |
|
oh thats a shame cause i hear alot of them are real gassy people, and i hear the new updates are going to have a beheading function with several other torture functions such as gagging and whipping....beheading could mean removing them from position of responsibility in the alliance, seems it is just a few hardcore holdouts not surrendering and the rest are lemmings
|
 |