Peace Offer Rejected

Deranzin wrote: Darkwords wrote:   edit: not to mention the FACT that this happened after Kumo made that claim and threatened to exterminate accounts on our side, which as you should know has generally been accepted as approval for us to do the same to you.  There was even a forum vote on it. Your own side made the forum vote and that your "interpretation" of that post ... since when that is a fact .?.

The FACT is that we had not done it b4 your great leader sanctioned it in his forum post, anyone can go look for his thread titled 'rules' and see that for a fact.   You know this yourself, so I do not see why you keep claiming to the contrary.

[/QUOTE]

Deranzin wrote: Simple fact : You have exterminated accounts (more than one) and whether those where well-defended or not is immaterial since it does not alter that fact in ANY way.

I never claimed we had not, merely that Kumo tried to put us in a bad light b4 we had done.  that is the SIMPLE FACT so why are you trying to claim otherwise?

If you consider us bad for destroying a few accounts so far (after such action was sanctioned by your own leader), how do you rate your own alliance for all the accounts that it has destroyed over the years? Or for the fact it was your leader who approved such action in this war (see Kumo's Rules post [again])

[/QUOTE]

Deranzin wrote: You want to disprove my point .?. FIND PROOF of the contrary ... spins and excuses "like he said that" or "I understood this" are neither "proof" nor facts in any reasonable argument. Whether you had enough reasons and justification in doing what you did DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACTS.

Yes and anyone with half a brain cell can see it is you that is constantly spinning this issue.  The facts do not change, they do not need to, because you will not address them

Deranzin wrote: So, you want to argue that what you did was somehow ok or needed .?. That is reasonable and I will gladly read your reasoning. But calling FACTS as "BS claims" then this is not a dialogue but a make belief sermon and it is unreasonable to begin with.

All that is unreasonable is your inability to address the simple fact that I raised in the first place, and your frankly childish dodging of the issue, that your leader stated we have exterminated accounts b4 we had done.

Please explain how that make what I posted wrong in anyway???

Also will you actually address the main point in my post (that you decided to delete from your quotes) about the insults thrown at us by your leader and his inability  to respond to any questions raised about his own posts here, this is what annoys me much more

That is my 5 cents. I have nothing else to add to this topic ...

Edit:

Auraya wrote: Casualties are a part of warfare. I have a lot of respect for people who continue to play despite having their accounts reduced to dust. Kudos to them!

Sure they are and indeed those people deserve at least some respect instead of that "hey we didn't do it" mentality that is presented here.
[/QUOTE]

Epidemic wrote:  Since this is a unique game that style of gameplay would ruin the player base and slowly, but surely, end the game. It takes a long time for slow games to die a slow death.

Edited by Tatharion - 05 Jan 2014 at 18:43

Brandmeister wrote: Guys, can we maybe tone down the abuse of bold, italics, caps, underline, and large text? Also please use the quote tags properly, and preview your posts. Despite various Internet fables, making your text REALLY BiG does not actually make it more persuasive. I know the forums aren't exactly the Fortress of Grammer* (TM), but we are nearing the precipice of multicolored flashing text. Let's all just back away slowly and resume slinging mud in the usual neutral toned standard fonts. * Irony intended by egregiously misspelling grammar.

qft

All I have to say: nobody really understand H?

jcx wrote: Then the alliance should encourage the player to exodus to their region or drop out of the war if he or she doesn't want to get caught in the outer fringes. Its optional since exoing with lots of troops inside will cost you a lot. Dropping out from the war is optional too - but if you do - prolly your leaders will kill if you. :D

Not if you are on our side.

All players should be free to surrender from the war if that is what they wish, I have heard some rumor of a certain alliance threatening its members to not surrender, however if someone is under such itinerant threats from some insane leader they should let the other side know, so as protection can be offered as part of the surrender terms.