| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
Corwin 
Forum Warrior
Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Location: Farshards
Status: Offline
Points: 310 |
 Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:14 |
 Smoking GNU wrote:
I think there is one point in this aargaarbl that people are missing.
Where is Valars support? If they are being wronged in such a way as many of the people here point out (Ganged up on, witch hunt, mob rule, ect ect ect) Where is the overwhelming moral support for valar against the senseless aggressors. Where are their confeds? And if their confeds are assisting without declaring war or public announcements, WHY? Why are they ashamed to help out Valar openly?
Think about these questions for a while.
|
As there are 5 alliances on the other side, much alliances who would maybe want to support Valar or at least think they are being wronged have diplomatic relations on the other side. And as odds are now, Valar is surely going to lose the war. Would you join in a war you would know you lose? This is the same thing as if America and and all of UN would gang up against... lets say Denmark (or any other country), because they didn't punish a criminal hard enough in their eyes. You think any country that supports Denmark in their action to stay true to their own laws would be so stupid to join in the war? Offcourse nobody joins in a war with such odds.
|
 |
Smoking GNU
Forum Warrior
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Location: Windhoek
Status: Offline
Points: 313 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:18 |
|
So, that's an "I don't know" to my question then? It was pretty direct.
|
|
karpintero
Greenhorn
Joined: 27 Sep 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 50 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:24 |
Smoking GNU wrote:
So, that's an "I don't know" to my question then? It was pretty direct. |
That was a pretty sufficient answer, if you understood what he said.
|
|
Grego
Postmaster
Joined: 09 May 2010
Location: Klek
Status: Offline
Points: 729 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:25 |
Smoking GNU wrote:
I think there is one point in this aargaarbl that people are missing.
Where is Valars support? If they are being wronged in such a way as many of the people here point out (Ganged up on, witch hunt, mob rule, ect ect ect) Where is the overwhelming moral support for valar against the senseless aggressors. Where are their confeds? And if their confeds are assisting without declaring war or public announcements, WHY? Why are they ashamed to help out Valar openly?
Think about these questions for a while.
|
Who can dare to raise against H?, Curse, and their vasals? Also, people usualy dont care about someone elses troubles, till those same troubles come to them.
|
|
Erik Dirk
Wordsmith
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 158 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:27 |
|
GNU if we really have to spell it out to you any neutral players are afraid to become a target, H? attacks on boromir are for amusement only why should neutral players think they won't get the ax if they stick their neck out.
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:27 |
karpintero wrote:
Smoking GNU wrote:
So, that's an "I don't know" to my question then? It was pretty direct. |
That was a pretty sufficient answer, if you understood what he said.
|
why can't i find you ingame? or is this another of these accounts made to just to spew nonsense?
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
Corwin
Forum Warrior
Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Location: Farshards
Status: Offline
Points: 310 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:30 |
indeed i don't know as i am not in an alliance you reffering to. But if you read well I stated a reason that could be your answer: They are affraid to get in a fight that could completely destroy their alliance. I can't blame them for that. For myslef, I don't like witchhunts, but I know the hunters will eventually become the hunted. I see no need for me to take actions. I am neutral in this matter as I still haven't heard the reasons for this war, other then people saying they don't like the way Valar act. Personally I believe that can be solved in other ways then an all to one war.
|
|
Smoking GNU
Forum Warrior
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Location: Windhoek
Status: Offline
Points: 313 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:33 |
|
So, basically, they're afraid to enter in a fight you see as righteous for Valar and the only hope for a fair game in Illy and allowing Valar to get crushed?
Basically the opposite of what Lorre did?
|
|
karpintero
Greenhorn
Joined: 27 Sep 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 50 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:36 |
Why would Lorre be afraid when he knows that Harmless will help him?
Also, hi to Lorre.
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 14:38 |
karpintero wrote:
Why would Lorre be afraid when he knows that Harmless will help him?
Also, hi to Lorre.
|
why would they be afraid when they know valar will help them?
also atleast tell who you are noone here has been attacked for stating there oppinion why should you be?
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
Tweet
PA and Champ declare war against Valar