| Author |
Topic Search
Topic Options
|
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 53 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:03 |
|
Really, come on, what does population have to do with troop levels? Why are we talking about population of newer accounts when troops are the ones doing the fighting.
I have not researched the technology that allows me to send my citizens to battle. I am guessing my citizens would not much care for me if I did.
If NC and Bane want to be open about this. Let us allow an impartial party (not Dark or h? at this point) sitting rights to look at troop levels of the accounts that have joined recently.
I think that perhaps a member of the Crow Federation would be a good choice for this task.
Rather than speculation, postering and spin. We would have actual troop numbers to see what NC and Bane is doing.
Once we have numbers we can go from there.
Edited by Kompanion - 02 Sep 2013 at 19:04
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:14 |
Kompanion wrote:
If NC and Bane want to be open about this. Let us allow an impartial party (not Dark or h? at this point) sitting rights to look at troop levels of the accounts that have joined recently. |
Why should any of those alliances do that .?.
Kompanion wrote:
I think that perhaps a member of the Crow Federation would be a good choice for this task. |
Why should the CrowFed bother to take the responsibility .?. Did you ask them before involving them in this proposal .?.
Kompanion wrote:
Rather than speculation, postering and spin. We would have actual troop numbers to see what NC and Bane is doing. |
Again WHY bother .?. It is not YOUR war ... get off your high horses guys and let NC and BANE
PLAY THEIR CONFLICT as THEY LIKE.
Their war, their rules. Simple as that.
|
 |
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 53 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:16 |
|
Deranzin,
Why try to get facts?
I guess I don't know how to respond to that.
|
 |
Epidemic
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Nov 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 768 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:18 |
|
Might as well throw my 2 cents in...
I can't tell who is winning and who is losing, to me it looks like a tie. It's been pretty savage though, with a few players losing a lot of towns.
From what I see in the initial thread is that BANE was depleted of troops from the last tourney, but still managed for the most part to hold their own. I remember someone saying BANE/II were in the process of merging before this war started.
To me this thread looks to be quite simple; GC has been stirring with gossip ever since BANE/DARK became confed. DARK created this thread to let us know where they stand.
If players from other alliance jump into the fray to help one side I see no problem with one alliance saying we will also jump into the fray to help those on the other side.
I'm not taking sides, there are players on both sides I respect.
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:23 |
Kompanion wrote:
Deranzin,
Why try to get facts?
I guess I don't know how to respond to that. |
Why BOTHER with facts which
do not concern you ... start by answering that ...
Also do tell us under which logic two warring alliances would go
public with their troop levels to a third alliance ... what would they gain and why would they share that crucial information .?.
|
 |
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 53 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:33 |
|
Deranzin,
1) Only accounts which have joined recently would be looked at and only by a mutually agreed upon party.
2) We have taken a position and there is much debate over things that do not concern you. I am in Dark so yes, they do concern me.
3) It seems you want to argue about things that you have no business in are you in Bane or NC? Hard numbers would take any spin out of it. Perhaps that is what you are opposed to.
|
 |
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:33 |
|
It's been three months. Population equals gold equals troops. Three months. Who has the advantage after three months? Isn't BANE building?
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
 |
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 53 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:38 |
abstractdream wrote:
It's been three months. Population equals gold equals troops. Three months. Who has the advantage after three months? Isn't BANE building? |
I am talking about looking to see if NC brought in powerful accounts recently, in an attempt to turn the war. Only recent accounts are the ones in question. So why not bring them to light? Would you like to know the truth or keep it hidden?
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:41 |
Kompanion wrote:
Deranzin,
1) Only accounts which have joined recently would be looked at and only by a mutually agreed upon party. |
Under what AUTHORITY would you force those people from BOTH SIDES to wield their account's information and troop levels .?.
And mutually agreed by whom .?. By the alliance leaders .?.
Since when do alliances OWN and ORDER the players to such an extent as to make a player/individual lay bare his account for others to see .?.
Also, supposing that one side - ANY SIDE - ends up having a some slightly better recruits ...
SO WHAT .?.
Kompanion wrote:
2) We have taken a position and there is much debate over things that do not concern you. I am in Dark so yes, they do concern me. |
This is a public forum. You posted them PUBLICLY, ergo they CONCERN EVERYONE, ok .?. Next time you want to keep a lid on things, do think over your actions and where you post your thoughts and strategies, instead of trying to sensor people afterwards.
Kompanion wrote:
3) It seems you want to argue about things that you have no business in are you in Bane or NC?
|
Neither are you, last time I checked.
Kompanion wrote:
Hard numbers would take any spin out of it. Perhaps that is what you are opposed to.
|
There is NO spin in the simple thing I am saying.
THEIR WAR, THEIR RULES. What exactly can't you understand in that simple and perfectly clear concept ?
|
 |
Halcyon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Israel Status: Offline Points: 360 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:42 |
These questions have become academic.
We have stated our intent and unless peace is agreed upon (it may be agreed with me despite Dark accounts not being in the war yet) we will begin to act soon.
I wish those soon to become our enemies luck in battles and misfortune in the war.
I do not plan to post again in this thread (though I've been known to change my mind), so interested parties my igm me.
Glory to the builders! (where did that come from?!)
|
 |