Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - NC-Bane war
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Topic ClosedNC-Bane war

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 11>
Author
Kompanion View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 53
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:03
Really, come on, what does population have to do with troop levels? Why are we talking about population of newer accounts when troops are the ones doing the fighting.

I have not researched the technology that allows me to send my citizens to battle. I am guessing my citizens would not much care for me if I did.

If NC and Bane want to be open about this. Let us allow an impartial party (not Dark or h? at this point) sitting rights to look at troop levels of the accounts that have joined recently.

I think that perhaps a member of the Crow Federation would be a good choice for this task.

Rather than speculation, postering and spin. We would have actual troop numbers to see what NC and Bane is doing.

Once we have numbers we can go from there.


Edited by Kompanion - 02 Sep 2013 at 19:04
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:14
Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:


If NC and Bane want to be open about this. Let us allow an impartial party (not Dark or h? at this point) sitting rights to look at troop levels of the accounts that have joined recently.


Why should any of those alliances do that .?.

Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:


I think that perhaps a member of the Crow Federation would be a good choice for this task.


Why should the CrowFed bother to take the responsibility .?. Did you ask them before involving them in this proposal  .?.

Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:


Rather than speculation, postering and spin. We would have actual troop numbers to see what NC and Bane is doing.


Again WHY bother .?. It is not YOUR war ... get off your high horses guys and let NC and BANE PLAY THEIR CONFLICT as THEY LIKE.

Their war, their rules. Simple as that.
Back to Top
Kompanion View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 53
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:16
Deranzin,

Why try to get facts?

I guess I don't know how to respond to that.
Back to Top
Epidemic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 768
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:18
Might as well throw my 2 cents in...

I can't tell who is winning and who is losing, to me it looks like a tie. It's been pretty savage though, with a few players losing a lot of towns.

From what I see in the initial thread is that BANE was depleted of troops from the last tourney, but still managed for the most part to hold their own. I remember someone saying BANE/II were in the process of merging before this war started.

To me this thread looks to be quite simple; GC has been stirring with gossip ever since BANE/DARK became confed. DARK created this thread to let us know where they stand.

If players from other alliance jump into the fray to help one side I see no problem with one alliance saying we will also jump into the fray to help those on the other side.

I'm not taking sides, there are players on both sides I respect.
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:23
Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:

Deranzin,

Why try to get facts?

I guess I don't know how to respond to that.


Why BOTHER with facts which do not concern you ... start by answering that ... Wink

Also do tell us under which logic two warring alliances would go public with their troop levels to a third alliance ... what would they gain and why would they share that crucial information .?.

Back to Top
Kompanion View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 53
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:33
Deranzin,

1) Only accounts which have joined recently would be looked at and only by a mutually agreed upon party.

2) We have taken a position and there is much debate over things that do not concern you. I am in Dark so yes, they do concern me.

3) It seems you want to argue about things that you have no business in are you in Bane or NC? Hard numbers would take any spin out of it. Perhaps that is what you are opposed to.

Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:33
It's been three months. Population equals gold equals troops. Three months. Who has the advantage after three months? Isn't BANE building?
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
Kompanion View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 53
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:38
Originally posted by abstractdream abstractdream wrote:

It's been three months. Population equals gold equals troops. Three months. Who has the advantage after three months? Isn't BANE building?


I am talking about looking to see if NC brought in powerful accounts recently, in an attempt to turn the war. Only recent accounts are the ones in question. So why not bring them to light? Would you like to know the truth or keep it hidden?
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:41
Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:

Deranzin,

1) Only accounts which have joined recently would be looked at and only by a mutually agreed upon party.


Under what AUTHORITY would you force those people from BOTH SIDES to wield their account's information and troop levels .?.

And mutually agreed by whom .?. By the alliance leaders .?. Since when do alliances OWN and ORDER the players to such an extent as to make a player/individual lay bare his account for others to see .?.

Also, supposing that one side - ANY SIDE - ends up having a some slightly better recruits ... SO WHAT .?.

Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:


2) We have taken a position and there is much debate over things that do not concern you. I am in Dark so yes, they do concern me.


This is a public forum. You posted them PUBLICLY, ergo they CONCERN EVERYONE, ok .?. Next time you want to keep a lid on things, do think over your actions and where you post your thoughts and strategies, instead of trying to sensor people afterwards. Tongue

Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:


3) It seems you want to argue about things that you have no business in are you in Bane or NC?


Neither are you, last time I checked. Wink

Originally posted by Kompanion Kompanion wrote:


Hard numbers would take any spin out of it. Perhaps that is what you are opposed to.


There is NO spin in the simple thing I am saying. THEIR WAR, THEIR RULES.  What exactly can't you understand in that simple and perfectly clear concept ? Wink

Back to Top
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 19:42
These questions have become academic.
We have stated our intent and unless peace is agreed upon (it may be agreed with me despite Dark accounts not being in the war yet) we will begin to act soon.

I wish those soon to become our enemies luck in battles and misfortune in the war.

I do not plan to post again in this thread (though I've been known to change my mind), so interested parties my igm me.

Glory to the builders! (where did that come from?!)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 11>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.