Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ministers
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Ministers

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Beyljr View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Beyljr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Ministers
    Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 15:36
The reason ministers are a good thing to have:

Ministers simply allow more people to play, however they wish to play. Nobody is forced to use ministers of any kind. So those that don't like ministers don't have to use them. Some people want to spend huge amounts of time online talking while playing, and even with ministers, they would be able to continue to do so. However one thing that I have seen here is that Illy has a VERY high proportion of older people playing the game. Well over 2/3 of the ones that I talk to have full time jobs. Those people want to be able to play, but can't afford to spend a lot of time doing so. Those people also have a little bit of money, and would gladly trade a small amount of money in exchange for saving a little bit of time doing the monotonous grunt type work. This is where the ministers benefit everyone. They provide a means of those that can only spend a small amount of time each day to pay for the upkeep of the game for those that can spend a lot of time in the game. About half of the people that I know of that quit, did so because they simply couldn't afford to spend the amount of time it takes to play it any more. Ministers would solve that problem.

Misc: Obviously ministers would never replace the people. They would not be real smart. If a person relied too heavily on them for extended absences, they may very well come back and find that they no longer exist in the game. And that would be by design. You would never make minister smart enough to replace the people that they help.

Each of these ministers could cost the same 5 prestige per city per week that your other ministers do currently, and would also require an active prestige account.

An important aspect of these ministers is that they would NEVER do anything that the player couldn't do themselves if they were online. I.e. they would NOT give any advantages to the player other than convenience.

Potential profit to Illy: As can be seen, the potential for profit to Illy is 5 ministers times 10 cities times 2 accounts times 5 prestige = 480 prestige per player per week. It is unlikely that most will spend all 480 (though some might) but a lot will probably use 1 or more of these ministers.

What types of ministers could Illy have: One or more of the following:

Building minister: In its simplest form it could be something as simple as providing 6 building slots instead of only 2. When one of the 2 normal slots becomes empty, it is replaced with the next item in the "extended" build queue.

War minister: It can schedule a particular army to attack a particular target, and arrive at a particular time. If the army is not present when the scheduled departure time arrives, then the attack is cancelled.

Production Minister: Whenever a production queue (not including troops or diplos) becomes less than xx hours long, then it would automatically schedule another 1000 of whatever the last item in the queue is. For instance, if the last item queued in the blacksmith was swords, then the next item scheduled would also be swords. There would be a single production minister for all buildings, but each building would have a check that enabled or disable it for that building. To stop the re-queuing for a particular building, you would simply turn off the production minister for that building.

Defense minister: It can be set to either automatically dodge any incoming attack, or can be set to call in reinforcements from other cities that are within xx miles when attacked. Obviously these options are not all-saving for the person, and the person would use them at their own risk. Nothing ever beats the person being present.

Cotter/Gatherer: It would use the cotters and skinners in that city to gather stuff that is either within xx squares, or currently has one of the player's armies posted on the square. It would not send to any square that had another player's army on it, or already had anyone's gatherer posted on it.

Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 18:01
To me, this seems like putting Illyriad on "auto-play."

The one aspect I sort of like would be the ability to send an army at a specified time.  If this were implemented, I would hope it could only be scheduled up to 24 hours (or maybe only 12 hours) in advance.  The purpose of this would be to prevent people from having to stay up all night to time army movements.

I'm a little ambivalent about even that, since part of the "fun" and challenge of a war or tournament is that it's HARD to get everyone to be up at the right time, and someone always oversleeps, etc. (Or, if you are lucky it's the OTHER side that misses their time.) Sure, it might be more efficient, but is it more Fun?

One advantage I would see is that since sitters presumably couldn't use this option, it would make sat accounts potentially less efficient than real accounts.  Since as I comment below sat accounts don't take that much time to play, this effect would probably be minimal.

The bottom line is, Illy is really not all that time-consuming to play, unless you are in a war or other high-intensity event, or choose to play in such a way that makes it so.

I think this change is unnecessary and potentially unFun.


Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 19:36
This seems like another way for people to run multiple accounts with less effort. Most permasats probably do password sharing as well. Players wanting the advantage of tight synchronization, constant harvesting or frequent builds should recruit a properly active sitter. If they can't afford the time to play the game... oh well.
Back to Top
Steven Quincy Urpel View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 06 May 2014
Location: OUTER (SPACE)
Status: Offline
Points: 117
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Steven Quincy Urpel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 19:40
I do not like this idea either, basically for the same reasons as the Rill.
They call me MISTER Urp!
Back to Top
Beyljr View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Beyljr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 21:07

Rill said: “To me, this seems like putting Illyriad on "auto-play."

Yes, it is effectively putting some of the more mundane aspects of the game on auto-play. I think that most people that play this game, do so for reasons other than wanting to go through all the build queues of all the cities and doing the monotonous task of requeuing them every day. I think they want more time to plan strategies, or to talk to others, or to do other more meaningful things. And if not, then they can still do it all manually. Nobody will ever be required to get the ministers.

Rill also said: “I'm a little ambivalent about even that, since part of the "fun" and challenge of a war or tournament is that it's HARD to get everyone to be up at the right time, and someone always oversleeps, etc. (Or, if you are lucky it's the OTHER side that misses their time.) Sure, it might be more efficient, but is it more Fun?”

I beg to differ with you. It is not fun to me to stay up half the night to launch the various attacks in order to get them there at the appointed time, and then get up early in the morning to go to work. If I have to choose between playing the game, or being awake at work, the game loses. Period. So why would we go out of our way to make people upset at the game? Or worse yet to have to chose between playing the game or working for a living. Why not offer them a choice? If they want to do it all manually, go for it. And if not, then offer them a legal alternative.

And I am not suggesting anything that can’t be done already anyway. There are plenty of bot browser addins that will do it already for those that don’t want to obey the rules. I am simply suggesting that we allow it legally, in such a way that helps the game instead of hurting it, and in such a way that gives those that obey the rules the same advantages as those that don’t.

Brandmeister, said "This seems like another way for people to run multiple accounts with less effort. Most permasats probably do password sharing as well".

If permasats do password sharing, then they are already in violation of the rules, and should eventually get caught and banned. This suggestion is not about trying to make rule breakers have a harder time, it is about giving those that obey the rules an easier time. And if they don't care about the rules, then they probably also have bots that do all of this stuff already anyways.

With that said, what I am proposing is letting those that play by the rules have some of the same advantages as those that violate the rules by using bots. Namely a little automation.

You also said "Players wanting the advantage of tight synchronization, constant harvesting or frequent builds should recruit a properly active sitter."

Why should people have to team up and have 2 people play the same account in order to be able to play the game fully. The game is about each player playing it, not a bunch of players all playing a single account. I have played games that effectively require a sitter or two per account, and you might notice that I am here instead of playing those games. Why not let those that want to play an account without needing a sitter, do so? And if that makes them easier prey because they are not online when you attack, so be it, enjoy your prey. Then both you and they are happier, and everyone benefits.

Back to Top
Sheza View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Location: Kumala
Status: Offline
Points: 325
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sheza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 21:16
Sounds like to me its a Bot .  no thanks Been there done that ..  
The charm of the game to me is that it is slow. 
Bots ruined the game I used to play .. 
The botters were huge and normal player were eaten alive. 


Edited by Sheza - 22 Dec 2014 at 19:23
If Horses don't go to Heaven when they die. then I want to go where they go.
Back to Top
Consul Zynot View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 08 Aug 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Consul Zynot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 21:22
Stop trying to turn Illyriad into    LOU...  
Back to Top
Beyljr View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Beyljr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 21:38
I never mentioned LOU, you did. But since you did, it would stand to reason that if another similar game did it, then perhaps some people like it, and maybe, just maybe, it might be worthwhile doing it.

But FWIW, if I were trying to turn this game into LOU, then I would probably be lobbying to make bots legal, instead of lobbying for the game to change. LOU had the user community fill in a lot of the missing details instead of hiring developers to do it.
Back to Top
Sir Edward III View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 07 Mar 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Sir Edward III Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 21:45
The idea isn't to turn Illyriad into LoU, but it is to borrow one of the things that did work better in LoU.  The War minister idea in particular would be helpful.  The building minister would only help when you are first starting a city, which helps keep new players interested, but wouldn't be used in your city once you wound up with the multi day build times.  I like the idea of a production manager too, but that one isn't as important.  Same with the cotter one, maybe allow them to turn right back around to the same square they were previously harvesting from.  Things like this only automate those portions of the game that require no thought, but basically are menial tasks.  The addition of the War minister adds a new level of strategy as far as timing original attacks etc and may increase that portion of the game. ( The idea of only allowing this schedule within a 24 hour period is fine too. ) It basically moves the need for getting up at 3 am to launch an attack.  As Bey said, those of us who have jobs or kids activities are going to put those things first.  If anything it evens things out vs those who are on here nearly 24/7.
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Dec 2014 at 22:04
If your entire argument boils down to "I don't want to wake up in the middle of the night to launch attacks," then maybe you should learn more about armies in Illyriad. A single piece of equipment or a single unit can slightly change the speed of an entire army. It is almost always possible to shift an army's launch time into a desired time slot.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.