| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
Attila the Hun 
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Location: Navvare/FL
Status: Offline
Points: 402 |
 Topic: League of nations "idea"
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 01:56 |
I have a idea, note this si not a recruitment message. so gms..dont move this..
With all the troubles going on, like current drama in my alliance and what not, or like what happened in the past with tmm. this all could have been avoided more easily with a league of nations."allainces". that way if there is a dispute the allaince rep could alert the other reps whats goign on, and we can all work together to solve it without war.
|
|
It's just a game. :)
|
 |
scottfitz
Forum Warrior
Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Location: Spokane WA USA
Status: Offline
Points: 433 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 02:04 |
interesting idea, ithis could be accomplished with some sort of alliance leader IGM list and possibly a chat room dedicated to this purpose.
|
|
Attila the Hun
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Location: Navvare/FL
Status: Offline
Points: 402 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 02:17 |
|
but in ui2 wasnt there going to be chat rooms? or is that a different update?
|
|
It's just a game. :)
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 07:45 |
|
I think this is a good idea, although TMM probably would've happened even with this. Alliances who have brains will be able to use this, however.
|
|
Hora
Postmaster
Joined: 10 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 839 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 12:39 |
Sounds nice. That will add even more politics to this game (I don't say politics are nice, but it however adds some fun to this game
 ).
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 16:00 |
I'm not sure what is proposed. Communications already occur between alliance leaders when a conflict arises. Nige refused to talk to anyone so any LoN would have not changed anything regarding TMM.
But otherwise, alliances in conflict do talk and negotiate. Some better than others. :)
Is LoN intended to be a committee that mediates disputes? Is this supposed to a Security Council? Will the LoN enforce its rulings through military action?
Other than sounding fancy, I don't see anything new that is workable here.
|
|
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 17:57 |
|
I support this idea
|
|
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 18:24 |
|
Such legalistic associations are perennially suggested in every sandbox game. Sometimes, such a thing is actually constructed, much to the eventual horror and regret of all involved. For unless it falls apart early on, without exception it becomes the next generation of evil--more resilient, irrational, and blind to reason or persuasion than any which came before.
I'll take an evil dictator over a committee any day.
Edited by HonoredMule - 05 Mar 2011 at 18:54
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 18:28 |
|
Why don't instead you have a chat room with your Confeds, that can only be viewed by people who're authorised to do so?
|
|
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821 |
Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 18:35 |
|
Im for anarchy to the greatest extent possible - ad I agree with HM - looking at our own world, whenever people in power congregate it usually ends up with someone getting bombed back to the stoneage.
|
|
Tweet
League of nations "idea"