Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - H? sieging small players nowhere near thier cities
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Topic ClosedH? sieging small players nowhere near thier cities

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 13>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 2 Votes, Average 3.00   Topic Search Topic Search   Topic Options Topic Options
Zork2012 View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 135
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 12:22
I am so happy that you have justyfied attacking small players by just saying they are alts, no more discussion or thought needed other than that.
These two players arent alts, but hey lets not let the facts get in the way
Back to Top
SunStorm View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 12:36
Basically, this is what I am hearing...

ICON: "Those big mean nasty H? players are attacking our little island for no reason."
H?: "Those ICON members are upset because we have frustrated their plans."

I can tell you this much.  If you had accomplished this feat (conquering an entire island and making yourselves unsiegeable), as soon as ships are released, your towns would have been in for a world of hurting...  or did you not realize that H? has sea ports as well?  (just my thoughts)
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR

Back to Top
Zork2012 View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 135
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 12:43
SunStorm, I didnt complain about them seiging Jude Borg or myself.
We have/had some smaller players who have done nothing wrong and didnt move to an island close to H? and yet they are being sieged.
These 2 players never attacked H? and when I look at the diplomacy page for ICON I see only 2 declarations of war, niether is with H? and we only declared 1 because we were being sieged by Champs already
Back to Top
Kurfist View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 12:49
Nothing will save you, in the end we can take a step back, take a break for a few weeks and think about going back in again to try it another time round, to me thats part of the fun.  like a detective game.
just kill the accounts now, you know what the end results will be anyway.
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
Back to Top
Starry View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 612
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 13:12
Originally posted by Zork2012 Zork2012 wrote:

SunStorm, I didnt complain about them seiging Jude Borg or myself.
We have/had some smaller players who have done nothing wrong and didnt move to an island close to H? and yet they are being sieged.
These 2 players never attacked H? and when I look at the diplomacy page for ICON I see only 2 declarations of war, niether is with H? and we only declared 1 because we were being sieged by Champs already


Again, incorrect, we have attacked only accounts that have been involved in the relocation fiasco you created.      Btw, do we want to talk about the "new accounts" that were created during these ops?    I expect you don't.  Tongue

Enough with the innocent act, you knew the risk when you started these moves and the consequences for those actions, now you pay the price.     To be honest, if we really wanted ICON gone, it would have happened already, however, that is NOT how we play the game.   

For the record, these ops do not merit a declaration of war as they are classified as minor ops.


Edited by Starry - 31 Oct 2011 at 13:20
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?

"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule

Back to Top
Kurfist View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 13:26
just because they are smaller then you and will take less time to kill does not make it a war, regardless of what you consider the appropriate definition is.

war/wôr/

Verb:
Engage in a war.

Noun:
A state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state.

Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
Back to Top
Anjire View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 13:50
For the record, the WAR declaration was indeed made by StJude when he was in the original ICON before ceding control of that alliance to Qwazar and reforming ICON to continue.   No effort was made by him or any other member that switched from ICON(now LIONS) to ICON to make amends or sue for peace.

Pretending that because there is no public display in your current alliance diplomatic screen that the initial war declaration made by you would somehow be forgotten by H? is most amusing.  
Back to Top
SunStorm View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 14:22
Zork, I understand how you are feeling about accounts which have done no wrong.  This player (who was there on the Island before you joined him) may very well be a legit player.  If that is the case, I would counsel him to leave your alliance.
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR

Back to Top
Createure View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 14:51
Originally posted by Truth Truth wrote:

Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:

I'm not howling for any rule change - I'm all for creative game-play.

I just posted so you guys understand why some members of H? feel like they need to take steps to insulate themselves from ICON's tactics - and this is not just your average nooby bashing.


Hmmm... Since H? is well known for being creative in their game play one would think they would not target an enemy for being creative with their game play. Can someone say hypocrite? Now type it lol.

Lmao please don't twist my words. Please rethink your logic.

Certain members are H? are not targetting StJude and co. for playing creatively.

They are targetting them because they are using this creativity to the detriment of Harmless? - by setting themselves up in a strong position next to H? (who StJude makes no secret of despising).

Like I already said - I'm completely in favour of creative game-play - whoever uses it, whether it be my allies, my enemies or complete strangers. But that doesn't mean I don't have a right to defend myself when my enemies direct their creative tactics in my direction.


Edited by Createure - 31 Oct 2011 at 14:55
Back to Top
Ander View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1269
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Oct 2011 at 16:10
Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:

They are targetting them because they are using this creativity to the detriment of Harmless? - by setting themselves up in a strong position next to H? (who StJude makes no secret of despising).

"setting themselves up in a strong position next to H" ? Confused

Do you guys really fear him so much? Confused

Whenever I heard this line of reason before, I thought your alliance mates were giving it for the sake of an argument. I thought so because he is only a tiny fraction of Harmless'size. But your words are very convincing. Confused 











Edited by Ander - 31 Oct 2011 at 16:12
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 13>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.