| Author |
|
Truth 
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Oct 2011
Location: Truth
Status: Offline
Points: 57 |
 Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:09 |
 Brids17 wrote:
Indeed. I imagine if I started smashing newbie T? armies there would be a whole different view on the matter. I don't care if large players are attacking similarly larger players but when a large player attacks a much much smaller one, I see bullying no matter which way you spin it. |
Very good point. I still have not read a response to this from H?. And based on experience, most players have a pretty good idea that H? would be very upset if the same thing happened to T?.
H? has a history of doing anything they can to win in a tournament. Morals in a tournament is a word that means nothing to them.
That is the Truth.
Edited by Truth - 18 Jan 2012 at 00:10
|
 |
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:16 |
|
The truth is, whatever we feel about that action, we certainly are not going to respond to someone who isn't brave enough to use their character name in the forums.
Where's a good Billy goat when I need one?
Edited by Kumomoto - 18 Jan 2012 at 00:17
|
|
Truth
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Oct 2011
Location: Truth
Status: Offline
Points: 57 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:39 |
Kumomoto wrote:
The truth is, whatever we feel about that action, we certainly are not going to respond to someone who isn't brave enough to use their character name in the forums.
Where's a good Billy goat when I need one? |
The truth is, I am not going to respond to a player that hides in the most powerful alliance in the game. As such can say whatever they want because of this. aka = to a player that does not use their character name in the forums. See what I did there? Kumo, we are doing the same exact thing, you hide in big alliance, I hide my character name. No difference.
And back to the quote... Brids wrote that quote, not me... So respond to him.
Edited by Truth - 18 Jan 2012 at 00:42
|
|
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:44 |
Truth wrote:
H? has a history of doing anything they can to win in a tournament. Morals in a tournament is a word that means nothing to them.
That is the Truth. |
It is true - the word 'morals' does not mean much to us. We tend to steer clear of such subjective frameworks upon which to build our strategies.
If you had to pin us down to something though, it would be that we do not believe in attempting to adversely affect people beyond friendly competitiveness within the tournament. And we've always taken a "do unto others what you would have done unto yourself" attitude - as such we always made it clear that we would not hold grudges against people for tournament-centered pvp actions.
For example - If H? would truly do "Anything" to win tournaments we would probably have just seige+destroyed cities of the top commanders of our main competitors.
But I guess we've come to expect this kind of blatant propoganda from mr "Truth".
|
|
Truth
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Oct 2011
Location: Truth
Status: Offline
Points: 57 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:50 |
Createure wrote:
For example - If H? would truly do "Anything" to win tournaments we would probably have just seige+destroyed cities of the top commanders of our main competitors.
|
So should all the alliances expect this strategy in the next tournament?
|
|
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:51 |
|
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:53 |
Kumomoto wrote:
The truth is, whatever we feel about that action, we certainly are not going to respond to someone who isn't brave enough to use their character name in the forums. |
Then how about you respond to me, since I was the one who posed the question to begin with. Does H? truly support large players attacking newbies as long as they are taking part in the tournament?
|
|
|
|
Bartozzi
Greenhorn
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 96 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:56 |
|
Kumomoto is a player who "hides in the most powerful alliance in the game?" Really? He's hiding? Right, he obviously needs protection and would crumble like a sand castle if he belonged to a smaller alliance. Uhhh, right.....
|
|
Truth
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Oct 2011
Location: Truth
Status: Offline
Points: 57 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:58 |
Bartozzi wrote:
Kumomoto is a player who "hides in the most powerful alliance in the game?" Really? He's hiding? Right, he obviously needs protection and would crumble like a sand castle if he belonged to a smaller alliance. Uhhh, right..... |
You are right. He is hiding. Hiding in the biggest alliance in the game. And yes needs protection. Thank you for supporting me.
|
|
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191 |
Posted: 18 Jan 2012 at 00:58 |
|
If I may may a stab at an answer on Kumo's behalf?
I think I already answered the question above when I mentioned that Ander was probably correct when he wondered if most members of H? didn't support such a thing.
I guess you can appreciate though that we aren't going to publicly denounce an alliance mate at the behest of a bunch of people who this incident does not even directly concern. If this matter gets dealt with it will be internally and with the parties it concerns.
edit: In response to Brids' question above.
Edited by Createure - 18 Jan 2012 at 01:00
|
|
Tweet
H? attacking players at Standing Stones
Topic Options
