| Author |
Topic Search
Topic Options
|
Kilotov of DokGthung
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 723 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 14:41 |
<Squill> wrote:
Yeah Kilotov, perhaps the Dlords can join Valar. |
not gonna happen i am afraid.
its not like our coexistence was always peachy and happy u know.
|
 |
LordOfTheSwamp
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 May 2011 Location: Swamp of Fyrgis Status: Offline Points: 481 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 17:02 |
Gratch:
"
King Atreus, When in Valar, thieved A member of DE , when confronted, he returned resources but then continued."
Thanks. I didn't know that. Do you know if this is linked to King Atreus's departure from Valar? (I don't know if Atreus was kicked, or just left, and I don't know how the timings match up. So, curious.)
SunStorm:
"
like the mob of valar sieges and attacks headed to one player (Lorre)"
Do you mean Valar attacked Lorre before Lorre/PA declared war?! Holy cow - that's a massive revelation!
Or do you mean that after Lorre declared war, the Valar decided to give him a slap? In which case I'm not sure what you're complaining about, exactly?
|
|
"A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
|
 |
Dakota Strider
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 May 2011 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 17:27 |
|
Regardless, that "mob of valar sieges and attacks headed to one player (Lorre)" were 99.9% from one Valar player. And the Lorre town sieged, is one that he placed in the midst of that Valar player's cities a while back, apparently trying to goad Valar into attacking him then. Otherwise, how else can you explain him settling a town so far away from PA support, to be surrounded by players of an alliance he has always considered an enemy?
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Location: Groot Kortrijk Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 17:32 |
Dakota Strider wrote:
Regardless, that "mob of valar sieges and attacks headed to one player (Lorre)" were 99.9% from one Valar player. And the Lorre town sieged, is one that he placed in the midst of that Valar player's cities a while back, apparently trying to goad Valar into attacking him then. Otherwise, how else can you explain him settling a town so far away from PA support, to be surrounded by players of an alliance he has always considered an enemy? |
he wanst in valar when i placed that city there ^^
so get ur facts straight before trying to say something like that
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1269 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 17:54 |
Dakota Strider wrote:
Otherwise, how else can you explain him settling a town so far away from PA support |
Lorre once told me that he set up cities in different locations so that he could send caravans to newbies from the closest city. His 7 cities are in 7 different regions. Maybe he thought more about giving support than getting it. You may call that propaganda and blah blah.
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Location: Groot Kortrijk Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 18:15 |
SunStorm wrote:
<Squill> wrote:
Isn't it funny how mob justice starts in Illy? |
lol - like the mob of valar sieges and attacks headed to one player (Lorre)
Edit: added quote above
|
well that was all of tannhauser 5or 6 cities can do that. was nice to see the colour play ^^
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
<Squill>
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Jun 2011 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 218 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 18:19 |
Yeah, not a mob Lorre is right only one player:
FW: RE: RE: RE: ^^ Sent By: Tannhauser [VALAR] Received By: You Date: 9/25/2011 5:52:36 PM
> FW: RE: RE: RE: ^^ > Received: 25 Sep 2011 17:52 > Original Message:
Lorre
What are you waiting for then? It only took me 3 hours after YOU declared war before my attacks started. As for me believing you, you are asking for a lot. Except for when it suits your purpose, I do not believe Lorre and Truth live on the same street.
And by the way, feel free to go to the forums and correct your boy Sunstorm, claiming that mobs of Valar were attacking you. I do not believe you have a single combat report from this last skirmish, that included another player's armies besides yours, or mine.
Tann
> RE: RE: RE: ^^ > Received: 25 Sep 2011 17:38 > Original Message:
lol well dont believe me then
> RE: RE: ^^ > Received: 25 sep 2011 17:37 > Original Message:
Your mouth has a habit of writing check that your actions cannot cover.
> RE: ^^ > Received: 25 Sep 2011 15:23 > Original Message:
grats
ill take camelot in return
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Location: Groot Kortrijk Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 18:26 |
|
and camelot will be mine first need my pop up to 75k again tho would be a waste razing it
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 288 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 18:31 |
HonoredMule wrote:
Let me offer an alternative motivation for Harmless' war declaration: months of Valar leadership passive-aggressively provoking or insulting our members, testing our patience, and smoothing over diplomatic confrontations with feigned ignorance and/or vapid lip service lacking follow-through.
If I were to sum up Harmless's opinion of Valar's behavior and especially that of its leadership in a single phrase, that phrase would be "plausible deniability."
Too little effort was ever expended to make us actually believe they wanted peaceful or pleasant relations. Only enough was ever given to avoid directly instigating alliance-wide escalation, in the form of flimsy excuses and half-hearted non-apologies for "free enterprise" behavior (summarizing/very loosely paraphrasing). Azreil believes that he has toed some political line that gives him the upper hand PR-wise should we attack first, that he is orchestrating a clever balance of warmongering and disassociation. If you believe we're wrong to attack him simply because we're tired of his attitude and the sensibilities of his crew, perhaps he's a little right.
I would apologize for attacking while Valar's forces are otherwise occupied, but we don't really have another option in that matter. It might be nice to see how Harmless and Valar face up against each other one alliance to another, but if we waited for them to stop pursuing conflicts with smaller parties, we'd be old and grey. Harmless went to "DEFCON 2" over a month ago, and started escalating from DEFCON 5 well before that. Valar have been in other conflicts the whole time. Go back much further, and we had simply not yet reached the conclusion that continued interaction with Valar was so undesirable as to render war with them inevitable.
Were Valar a peaceful alliance, Harmless would feel much greater onus to justify "starting" a conflict with them. But given their taste for blood and our similar size, I firmly believe that "because we don't like you" ought to be wholly sufficient motivation--understanding of course, that our distaste is not some random happenstance but rather a reaction to real attitudes and behavior toward us.
We are a military alliance and have found a fair target. We don't honestly know how far we'll go or when we'll be satisfied. We do know that further empty promises and obsequious fluff won't cut it. We'd honestly have far more respect for Valar if their words actually matched their actions and they were honest about where we stood with each other. The time for wishy-washy crap is over.
|
Here he have it then. Harmless? - statistically the most powerful alliance in Illyriad have finally come out and declared war on Valar. HonoredMule's accompanying post though was very dissappointing. It contained:
1. a half apology for attacking while Valar are embroiled in the PA/CHAMP farce. Of course had it been the other way around Harmless and their many sycophants would be accusing Valar of a cowardly attack;
2. a complete inability to give any real evidence justifying a War between Harmless? and Valar other than vague references to slurs and insults. This must be difficult for those who always tried to claim the moral high ground because this declaration is devoid of any;
3. no real attempt to prove a cause
Of course we all know that the cause of this war was AmrothAnguireal. He together with Lorre pathetically engineered a situation where he could make false accusations and attempt to gain kudos for himself in a sickening parody of honour by challenging Azreil to one on one combat.
Here we have a situation where Harmeless? despite their numerical superiority have taken the advantage of the situation to attack Valar. Pathetic! To be honest I expected nothing less
I am sure that their propaganda machine and sycophnats will go into overdrive to come up with all sorts of exaggerations and distractions to hide the truth, but the truth is there for all to see.
"I would apologize for attacking while Valar's forces are otherwise occupied"
A cowards action and a cowards empty apology.
This war has the potential to to involve and affect every player in this game. Remember that it was AmrothAnguireal, Lorre and then Harmless? that caused it to be this way.
I urge all neutral players not to sit on the side lines but to actively participate to end this war and I hope that you will choose the side that stands for independent players rather than those who indulge bragging, lies and
propaganda. Fight for Valar!
|
 |
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 821 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 18:50 |
Celebcalen wrote:
HonoredMule wrote:
Let me offer an alternative motivation for Harmless' war declaration: months of Valar leadership passive-aggressively provoking or insulting our members, testing our patience, and smoothing over diplomatic confrontations with feigned ignorance and/or vapid lip service lacking follow-through.
If I were to sum up Harmless's opinion of Valar's behavior and especially that of its leadership in a single phrase, that phrase would be "plausible deniability."
Too little effort was ever expended to make us actually believe they wanted peaceful or pleasant relations. Only enough was ever given to avoid directly instigating alliance-wide escalation, in the form of flimsy excuses and half-hearted non-apologies for "free enterprise" behavior (summarizing/very loosely paraphrasing). Azreil believes that he has toed some political line that gives him the upper hand PR-wise should we attack first, that he is orchestrating a clever balance of warmongering and disassociation. If you believe we're wrong to attack him simply because we're tired of his attitude and the sensibilities of his crew, perhaps he's a little right.
I would apologize for attacking while Valar's forces are otherwise occupied, but we don't really have another option in that matter. It might be nice to see how Harmless and Valar face up against each other one alliance to another, but if we waited for them to stop pursuing conflicts with smaller parties, we'd be old and grey. Harmless went to "DEFCON 2" over a month ago, and started escalating from DEFCON 5 well before that. Valar have been in other conflicts the whole time. Go back much further, and we had simply not yet reached the conclusion that continued interaction with Valar was so undesirable as to render war with them inevitable.
Were Valar a peaceful alliance, Harmless would feel much greater onus to justify "starting" a conflict with them. But given their taste for blood and our similar size, I firmly believe that "because we don't like you" ought to be wholly sufficient motivation--understanding of course, that our distaste is not some random happenstance but rather a reaction to real attitudes and behavior toward us.
We are a military alliance and have found a fair target. We don't honestly know how far we'll go or when we'll be satisfied. We do know that further empty promises and obsequious fluff won't cut it. We'd honestly have far more respect for Valar if their words actually matched their actions and they were honest about where we stood with each other. The time for wishy-washy crap is over.
|
Here he have it then. Harmless? - statistically the most powerful alliance in Illyriad have finally come out and declared war on Valar. HonoredMule's accompanying post though was very dissappointing. It contained:
1. a half apology for attacking while Valar are embroiled in the PA/CHAMP farce. Of course had it been the other way around Harmless and their many sycophants would be accusing Valar of a cowardly attack; 2. a complete inability to give any real evidence justifying a War between Harmless? and Valar other than vague references to slurs and insults. This must be difficult for those who always tried to claim the moral high ground because this declaration is devoid of any; 3. no real attempt to prove a cause
Of course we all know that the cause of this war was AmrothAnguireal. He together with Lorre pathetically engineered a situation where he could make false accusations and attempt to gain kudos for himself in a sickening parody of honour by challenging Azreil to one on one combat.
Here we have a situation where Harmeless? despite their numerical superiority have taken the advantage of the situation to attack Valar. Pathetic! To be honest I expected nothing less
I am sure that their propaganda machine and sycophnats will go into overdrive to come up with all sorts of exaggerations and distractions to hide the truth, but the truth is there for all to see.
"I would apologize for attacking while Valar's forces are otherwise occupied"
A cowards action and a cowards empty apology.
This war has the potential to to involve and affect every player in this game. Remember that it was AmrothAnguireal, Lorre and then Harmless? that caused it to be this way.
I urge all neutral players not to sit on the side lines but to actively participate to end this war and I hope that you will choose the side that stands for independent players rather than those who indulge bragging, lies and propaganda. Fight for Valar! |
Celeb - war is war, there's never a right time or place for it if the odds are against you. Just to add my personal input - many stay out of this to give the Valar a sporting chance in this, and your attempt to rally supporters could have the opposite effect, that people who did not feel inclined to pitch in as to not make the odds any more uneven, simply thinkto themselves "Screw it, Ill join in, if nothing else than to rob the loosing side blind of all their res - its a freeforall anyway."
So please restrain yourselves from further warmongering - let the participants know where they stand in this,
|
|
"FYI - if you had any balls you'd be posting under your in-game name." - KP
|
 |