| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
Createure 
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191 |
 Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 09:30 |
 Erik Dirk wrote:
Could you lay out some very reasonable ground rules, I.e. no attacks on players under 5K total pop unless you yourself fall into that category? |
That is a pretty stupid question really - if we are wasting our time/energies attacking your small members we are doing something wrong.
But aside from this obvious tactical reason - H? has never picked on small people in the past and isn't about to start. I know VALAR has had problems in this area which I guess is why you feel the need to ask for a fixed agreement.
|
 |
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 09:48 |
|
Apologies swampy, don't know where that came from, proves that drinking is no good for me, now where the hell did I put that pitchfork.
|
|
<Squill>
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 218 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 10:03 |
Createure wrote:
Erik Dirk wrote:
Could you lay out some very reasonable ground rules, I.e. no attacks on players under 5K total pop unless you yourself fall into that category? |
That is a pretty stupid question really - if we are wasting our time/energies attacking your small members we are doing something wrong.
But aside from this obvious tactical reason - H? has never picked on small people in the past and isn't about to start. I know VALAR has had problems in this area which I guess is why you feel the need to ask for a fixed agreement.
|
Oh please, he was only asking a question, no need to hate on him.
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 10:21 |
<Squill> wrote:
Createure wrote:
Erik Dirk wrote:
Could you lay out some very reasonable ground rules, I.e. no attacks on players under 5K total pop unless you yourself fall into that category? |
That is a pretty stupid question really - if we are wasting our time/energies attacking your small members we are doing something wrong.
But aside from this obvious tactical reason - H? has never picked on small people in the past and isn't about to start. I know VALAR has had problems in this area which I guess is why you feel the need to ask for a fixed agreement.
|
Oh please, he was only asking a question, no need to hate on him. |
No hating involved. H? never attacks small guys and Valar has a history of it...
|
|
LordOfTheSwamp
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 May 2011
Location: Swamp of Fyrgis
Status: Offline
Points: 481 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 10:43 |
Kumomoto wrote:
No hating involved. H? never attacks small guys and Valar has a history of it...
|
Option 1: this is untrue. I've been in Valar for a few months, and am aware of 2 examples: one led to a weird diplomatic froth-storm (_duQ); one led to the perp leaving the alliance within 24 hours. That isn't a "history".
Option 2: this is true. If so, please explain this history. It may be that there have been a string of attacks that I, and presumably many other Valar, are unaware of.
I'm not judging it either way. Conceivably H?, Lorre, et all are a bit bored with the game and want an excuse to beat up a bunch of people. Equally conceivably, the Valar's leadership, or a faction within the Valar, have been doing things the rank-and-file are unaware of.
Can you elaborate?
|
|
"A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
|
|
Sloter
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 304 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 10:43 |
|
I asked yesterday but nobody replied.What are strategic goals of this war that once achieved will result in end of war.What are coalitions terms of victory?
|
|
Gratch
Wordsmith
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 150 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 10:49 |
LordOfTheSwamp wrote:
Kumomoto wrote:
No hating involved. H? never attacks small guys and Valar has a history of it...
|
Option 1: this is untrue. I've been in Valar for a few months, and am aware of 2 examples: one led to a weird diplomatic froth-storm (_duQ); one led to the perp leaving the alliance within 24 hours. That isn't a "history".
Option 2: this is true. If so, please explain this history. It may be that there have been a string of attacks that I, and presumably many other Valar, are unaware of.
I'm not judging it either way. Conceivably H?, Lorre, et all are a bit bored with the game and want an excuse to beat up a bunch of people. Equally conceivably, the Valar's leadership, or a faction within the Valar, have been doing things the rank-and-file are unaware of.
Can you elaborate?
|
King Atreus, When in Valar, thieved A member of DE , when confronted, he returned resources but then continued. Rinse and repeat a few times. All because it's not publicised or you are not told, doesn't make it not true.
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 11:07 |
|
Isn't it interesting how the aggrieved start coming out of the woodwork when they have less to fear from the bullies (or are interested in setting the record straight)?
Edited by Kumomoto - 25 Sep 2011 at 11:08
|
|
<Squill>
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 218 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 11:17 |
|
Isn't it funny how mob justice starts in Illy?
|
|
Gratch
Wordsmith
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 150 |
Posted: 25 Sep 2011 at 11:22 |
|
I was just disproving your argument. Nothing more, Nothing less.
|
|
Tweet
Game On