| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
HonoredMule 
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650 |
 Topic: Game Off
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:10 |
Hi all,
So, first off, the rumours - where are the rumours? Anyway, for the first time in
10 days (think about that) Harmless is actually, really ending hostilities.
<pause for effect>
We have not contacted any diplomatic liaisons brokering peace, and will not be doing so. We have no demands. All objectives involving Valar's current membership and/or leadership have been achieved. The old leadership and their worst aggressors are gone or at least punished, the new leadership is participating diplomatically, and we've bloodied Valar's nose over past offenses. Harmless offers peace in-game, and will simply not start any new operations.
This does not mean Harmless' war machine is grinding to a halt entirely, however. Harmless still have one or two siege operations in progress, and they shall be allowed to reach natural conclusion, provided that conclusion is no later than October 10th (after which we will withdraw on our own). King Atreus has launched a siege on us, which we will break and likely return in kind. Note that we do
not require that long-term Valar members refrain from participating in these battlefronts. You still have an opportunity to come together as an alliance and show some mettle, and doing so will not break the peace.
Most importantly, we take particular offense at players who have joined Valar from other non-confederated alliances just to unload their entire arsenal on us then fled like cowards to neutral alliances. These players shall each lose a city regardless of who tries to harbor or protect them. Do so at your own risk.
That said, most of Valar's members never even faced a real threat. A few of you saw some feints while most of you never responded or participated, nor were targeted in any way. Those of you who did not flee in terror at the first sign of adversity - or ragequit - I hope you at least enjoyed having the threat/opportunity to actually face a challenge.
Most of our real targets couldn't make it this far without sticking a gun in their mouth.
So, game off.
HM
|
|
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule
|
 |
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 |
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:18 |
|
Thanks for the update, HM.
|
|
nvp33
Wordsmith
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 124 |
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:20 |
|
Well played HM and H? Congratz on your win.
|
|
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288 |
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:25 |
 The_Dude wrote:
Thanks for the update, HM. |
Pathetic little brown noser
|
|
Sovereign
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 May 2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 43 |
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 20:33 |
Celebcalen wrote:
The_Dude wrote:
Thanks for the update, HM. |
Pathetic little brown noser
|
As per usual, you add constructive feedback. We should all be so thankful that you truly contribute so much to the content of the forums. I know I for one feel lucky. Thank you oh great and mighty one!
Hmm, was that a bit over the top? Ah well, I think the point is there none the less.
~SOV~
|
|
Sister Nikki
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 76 |
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 23:27 |
|
well spoken HM :)
p.s. Celeb your voice may be active, but i see your account suspended :)
|
|
Daufer
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 332 |
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 01:29 |
Celebcalen wrote:
Pathetic little brown noser
|
Now you see why he was so successful as our diplomat in Havoc Unleashed?
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483 |
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 02:03 |
HonoredMule wrote:
Most importantly, we take particular offense at players who have joined Valar from other non-confederated alliances just to unload their entire arsenal on us then fled like cowards to neutral alliances. These players shall each lose a city regardless of who tries to harbor or protect them. Do so at your own risk. |
Any chance you can shed some light on which of MoreBlue4U2's cities you'll be sieging?
|
|
|
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598 |
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 06:33 |
|
Whilst we have clearly had differences in opinion ( some seem to still be arguing over those both verbally and militarily), I congratulate H on their achievements. From the day I started playing this game, I took note that the top alliance had around 50 members, alliances 2 and 3 had around 150 members, it was clear even then that H were doing things more effectively than others, things have not changed since then clearly. All that has changed is my amount of knowledge ingame and my understanding of how H achieve their goals, some will claim it is dirty handed, others (judging by H's successful methods) meaning the majority, accept it as fair play. Again well done and lets look forward to the next however many months of peacetime until the factions are released and they take us all out.
Edited by Mr Damage - 07 Oct 2011 at 06:50
|
|
Sgt..Shanks
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56 |
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 08:22 |
|
If anybody thinks they are taking a legendary city because a long term, peaceful player sent a few lousy troops to help an old friend out (who was also peaceful) ~They can think again!!
|
|
Tweet
Game Off