Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Game Balance: Diplomatic Units
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Topic ClosedGame Balance: Diplomatic Units

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
Author
fluffy View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 20:26
Originally posted by GM Stormcrow GM Stormcrow wrote:

BASIC THIEF
  • Upkeep increase to 2 Gold Per hour
  • Build requirement will increase to 1 Horse and a training manual (1 Book)
  • Reduction in Carrying Capacity to 20 Units of Basic Resource and 2 Units of Advanced Resource
ADVANCED THIEVES
  • Upkeep increase to 4 Gold Per hour
  • Unit Build requirements will now include a saddle and 2 training manuals (2 Books)
  • Carrying Capacity will remain the same (50 units) for basic resources, and reduce to 5 Units of Advanced Resources



what resources are considered basic and which are considered advanced?

found the answer in the diplomacy help thread :P  duh



Edited by fluffy - 27 Mar 2010 at 20:31
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 00:56
Originally posted by GM Stormcrow GM Stormcrow wrote:


On the magic front, and referencing your earlier post regarding this - combat magic is not based around projected "unit slaying" effects, it is a set of Buffs and Debuffs that can be applied to units in motion and/or static armies that affect their combat abilities.

We're hopeful that - in the same way that Geomancy and Blights are "balanced" schools, providing equal and opposite effects but with other methods of achieving the same corrective effect (such as upgrading a Carpentry) - we can achieve the same with combat magic.   Corrective measures are based around either the opposite school applying an inverse action; or an alternative non-magic-based benefit such as a commander skill can balance out the adverse conditions.


I was actually referring to such spells as "Plague of Locusts" (Destroys a portion of food, livestock and horses at this city) which I have and could use now.  If I did, what could anyone do to protect themselves against that, and does the vault protect against such magic effects?  If I chose to use it as often as possible on a single target, would the target be required to endure the effects without any counter besides asymmetric pressure?  Would they be unable to protect their resources long enough to save the amounts needed for certain building upgrades or other progress?
Back to Top
GM Stormcrow View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Location: Illyria
Status: Offline
Points: 3820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 17:13
Item 1 of the Changes to Diplomatic Units has gone through, with one exception.

Saboteur units currently cost no Gold Upkeep whatsoever, until they are turned back "on" and can be used for missions.

We're testing the diplomatic combat algorithm changes at the moment, but don't want to rush this - and want to make sure it provides what we expect it to provide in a wide variety of scenarios.

So, it is unlikely that Saboteurs will be back online today - and to this end we do not believe that paying the increased upkeep is fair or necessary until they become productive units once again.

Once saboteur missions are renabled then the upkeep will start again.


Back to Top
Tracy Scoggins View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 17:33
Originally posted by GM Stormcrow GM Stormcrow wrote:

BASIC THIEF
  • Upkeep increase to 2 Gold Per hour
  • Build requirement will increase to 1 Horse and a training manual (1 Book)
  • Reduction in Carrying Capacity to 20 Units of Basic Resource and 2 Units of Advanced Resource
ADVANCED THIEVES
  • Upkeep increase to 4 Gold Per hour
  • Unit Build requirements will now include a saddle and 2 training manuals (2 Books)
  • Carrying Capacity will remain the same (50 units) for basic resources, and reduce to 5 Units of Advanced Resources
 


BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
BOOOOOOO!
BOOOOOOOOOO!
*throws eggs*
Next we'll need training manuals to wipe our damned asses too..
BOO!
From +something to -62 gold thanks to this -_-

-Arb-

p.s. BOO!

::edit:: Added some more BOO!

Edited by Tracy Scoggins - 28 Mar 2010 at 17:40
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 21:29
I think "training manuals" is a poor choice of label.  Everyone needs training.  How about "notebooks" or "report books?"  Scouts and spies need to take careful notes on everything they observe, and the latter must also memorize those details to better blend with their new environment.

And thieves have to...cook the books?  Perform tax evasion?
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 19:29
Also - given that it's reasonably easy to judge from trajectory where a scout is coming from and that by sending one military unit in attack mode I can get a full report on the makeup of an army, what's the point of scouts (aside from cannon fodder against runes)?
Back to Top
GM ThunderCat View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Location: Everywhere
Status: Offline
Points: 2157
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Mar 2010 at 20:15
Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

Also - given that it's reasonably easy to judge from trajectory where a scout is coming from and that by sending one military unit in attack mode I can get a full report on the makeup of an army, what's the point of scouts (aside from cannon fodder against runes)?

There are up coming changes that should make them more hidden on the map; and sending an army in is clearly a hositle action
Back to Top
GM ThunderCat View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Location: Everywhere
Status: Offline
Points: 2157
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 00:33
Originally posted by GM ThunderClap GM ThunderClap wrote:

Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

Also - given that it's reasonably easy to judge from trajectory where a scout is coming from and that by sending one military unit in attack mode I can get a full report on the makeup of an army, what's the point of scouts (aside from cannon fodder against runes)?

There are up coming changes that should make them more hidden on the map; and sending an army in is clearly a hositle action
Also Commanders cost (100 + 1000 * level) gold to resurrect - so it could be an expensive way of going about things...
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 03:19
It's a small matter to simply not level up a commander...or to put all upgrade points into defy death.  Bottom line is that there are various scenarios where tiny military assaults can thwart even the strongest of efforts into keeping one's activity or status a mystery.

Most other games will not show the enemy's unit counts in when no one comes home and/or when the attacker's forces are a tiny fraction of the defender's.  Now that encampments can be scouted, there's no need to allow city defenses/privacy to be overcome in this vaguely "exploity" way.
Back to Top
GM Stormcrow View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Location: Illyria
Status: Offline
Points: 3820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 2010 at 09:17
Yes, agreeing with HM here.

I don't think the victorious player's specific troop counts should be reported back to the losing side during:
a) a completely failed military engagement,
b) an engagement where only commanders survive,
c) an engagement where the Raid stratagem is used by the attacker

Which should suffice - and actually cuts both ways.

Any objections?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.