Dissolution of Consone

rolls eyes,,  until i am told the peace talks are over, whatever the results i am standing down. for  awhile the opposition has been totally non aggressive. personally, as a warmonger i have been extremely disappointed. in our last siege they even moved the castle to avoid the attack (hint hint). there comes a time when it just becoming some sort of sick bullying. this game hasnt been been played as war and we are seeing the results. people just dont play a balance game and the devs need to take note. there is a large segment of gamers that stay away from this game because of this type of game play. and everyone remember we are playing an online game, real life morals and ethics have nothing to do with game play. just dont break the very liberal rules. broken lands please hurry and open. leaders, make peace quickly so we can stop pretending we are warring!

would the leaders of the other side just surrender and accept terms? you are not even fighting, its terrible play for the game. its totally unfair to people on the other side and your own membership. 

gameplayer wrote: would the leaders of the other side just surrender and accept terms? you are not even fighting, its terrible play for the game. its totally unfair to people on the other side and your own membership.

Edited by Hora - 17 Feb 2013 at 14:20

 in other games u kill the leaders first, we not seeing any aggressive response in the west and are told that people are off limits to attacks, that we are only allow to take so many castles from people, maybe its different elsewhere, but in the west the war has become some sort of weird punishment play. total example of this is that alagos is totally off limits. if this was a true war that account would have been pushed out completely. other accounts are placed in weak positions that havent been touched. i think only a few attacks have been done against us. otherwords we are bored to death. when i write to the opposing team the response is that they are showing no aggression against us and even one individual moved to a neutral alliance. we are told there are peace talks going on but now i am hearing there are no terms? our side has been totally fair to the other side. surrender or start fighting, our side should allow us to unleash full power against them if they dont accept. people have a choice to stay in warring alliances, if the other side doesnt accept terms, lets kills their leaders not their membership. we might see a different tune sung if the punishment is directed at the right people, the ones that led them into this conflict and placed them in such weak positions. unleash us when ur ready, we will show no mercy as long as they are red but unleash us. growl, foaming at the bit...let us kill kill kill

Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote: I'd like to write that I'm (with impressively few exceptions) very impressed with the mature level of (always healthy) debate and discourse in this thread. The matter is one which is controversial and open to emotion. Justifiably so. My thanks and admiration to those which have contributed to this thread in a genuine, honest and respectful manner, and as such, it is one which we should be proud. I am.