Defending with Knights? |
Post Reply  |
Page <12 |
| Author | ||
Elanor 
New Poster  Joined: 09 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 10 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply  Posted: 16 Feb 2014 at 12:57 |
|
|
If you are under attack from a larger player and your best option is to hurt him enough to make him back off then you dont defend a city next to a building. Either move the city or write it off. You certainly dont start to make a mix of units just to defend a badly placed city. This might not feel good but if you are the underdog then you dont waste units on a bad position, you write if off and pick a better fight and later a better spot. : )
|
||
 |
||
| Deranzin
Postmaster   Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 16 Feb 2014 at 18:01 |
|
A siege on a building square is not an automatic win you know ... 
|
||
|
||
| jcx
Forum Warrior  Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 02:12 |
|
I agree on that - we have troops that has advantages on different terrains, attack/defense (cavs - plains, spears - mountain/forest, swords - forest/mountains, bows - mountains. or whatever come first. :D 
|
||
|
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
jcx in H? | orcboy in H? |
||
|
||
| Post Reply |
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Elanor wrote: