| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
threefoothree 
Greenhorn
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Location: tampa, florida
Status: Offline
Points: 88 |
 Topic: crow member hotattack
Posted: 22 Aug 2011 at 22:20 |
|
our member hotattack has left crow temporarily to siege a inactive crow member's city. hotattack is now being hit by thieves. i would like to publicly state that hotattack is still a member of crow and therefore is still under crow protection and attacks on him will be considered a attack on crow be it magic, diplomatic or military. hotattack will have a crow tag as soon as he captures the city he is sieging. thank you for your understanding and patients.
|
 |
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 |
Posted: 22 Aug 2011 at 23:10 |
|
For future reference, I am available to conduct "friendly" sieges for Crow members so that temporary alliance-exits could be avoided.
|
|
threefoothree
Greenhorn
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Location: tampa, florida
Status: Offline
Points: 88 |
Posted: 22 Aug 2011 at 23:42 |
|
thank you TD, your offer it will be remembered for the future, but in this case hotattack is capturing the city for his own, which unfortunately makes temporarily leaving a requirement.
|
|
belargyle
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 401 |
Posted: 23 Aug 2011 at 14:55 |
Count me in on that offer. Gives me something to do.. if anyone can be avaiable for the same for Dlords, when we have need, it would be appreciated as well.
Thanks Bel
P.S. None from this allaince (to my knowledge) have been sent.. just so you know where we stand
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452 |
Posted: 26 Aug 2011 at 19:57 |
|
Threefoothree, why not kick the Crow member?
|
|
Kilotov of DokGthung
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723 |
Posted: 26 Aug 2011 at 20:28 |
|
so other people cant take the OTHER cities of him
Edited by Kilotov of DokGthung - 26 Aug 2011 at 20:29
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452 |
Posted: 26 Aug 2011 at 20:34 |
|
|
|
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821 |
Posted: 26 Aug 2011 at 20:54 |
|
I cant help but add an afterthought to this thread.
Why do you not just remove the inactive player from your midst? I've never really understood the desire to "mummify your inactives" other than appearing larger than your actual strength, which is kinda pointless overtime.
But hey, at least Crow is open about it, and I can appreciate that.
my 2c
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 |
Posted: 26 Aug 2011 at 21:39 |
Tord - I think sometimes an alliance holds on the developed accounts just so other members can capture the "inactive" cities.
Bel - I can assist Dlord with friendly sieges anytime.
|
|
threefoothree
Greenhorn
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Location: tampa, florida
Status: Offline
Points: 88 |
Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 00:14 |
well spoken TD.
i want to keep the player so my other crow members can have the inactive members cities. if i kick the inactive member then everyone in illyriad will have a fair claim to take the cities not just our members.
|
|
Tweet
crow member hotattack