Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - creation of a war league
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Topic Closedcreation of a war league

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
twilights View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 915
Direct Link To This Post Topic: creation of a war league
    Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 20:45
has anyone consider forming a war league of perhaps six alliances who are at constant war with each other? of course there would have to be rules that would have to be enforced  but i think there is enough players in the game that would be interested...this way it might reduce all the verbal conflict going on between people that want to play the game differently. what are others thoughts? and as always please be polite with no personal name calling and please try to stay positive on the possibility. Smile
Back to Top
The Duke View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 21:36
I like the idea however I think that this will be curbed since BL will have an aggressive side
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
Back to Top
asasama View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 13 Feb 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 21:46
This idea seems to get suggested every 6 months and nothing ever comes of it.  Perhaps you could be the one to do the heavy lifting for setting such a system up twilights. 
Back to Top
Arakamis View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jul 2012
Location: Waterdeep
Status: Offline
Points: 97
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 23:25
I don't think there will be enough motivation for artificial wars..

You should have something to loose or win in order to fight imo. Tournaments, for instance, are fun but a real war is better as long as you are winning ofc. :D
Back to Top
st aug View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 15 May 2013
Location: unkown
Status: Offline
Points: 106
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 23:53
Constant war I don't know about that. You need time to regroup and rebuild. As far as the war league I like the idea of that but that will never go over in here not now. To many none fighters and players that wish to have nothing to do with fighting .   The game is changing and a new type of player is coming on board so you never know. Any thing that gets the players out of the shadows and banging on each other is ok by me. So great idea my dear my vote for a war league is yes
Back to Top
twilights View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 915
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 00:06
could have rules such as must have at least 5 castles in play or have to sit out until u rebuild..no nap, no confederation....both main and alt must be in same alliance..no spying and each player signs a contract agreeing to what ever rules the league has...these of course just suggestions...gosh if there is enough peeps into it we could have lots of fun..think of it, six alliance playing strategy to dominant but a safety clause that enables  player not to lose everything. it be war of games of thrones, constant rebuilding so players can jump right back in....
Back to Top
st aug View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 15 May 2013
Location: unkown
Status: Offline
Points: 106
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 00:26
hmm what about a war league that players of the same size only fight players of the same size.   Then the alliance's leaders can monitor there smaller players and teach them the game what to do when to do it and so on. As far as the bigger players they can have the own war league and do there thing . I don't know if the bigger players would enjoy it. But I think the smaller players would love it.
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 02:38
Personally, I think it's a possibility that a little name-calling is a positive thing.

Hope that was polite enough.

Wink


Edited by Rill - 23 Jun 2013 at 02:38
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 03:43
Originally posted by twilights twilights wrote:

could have rules such as must have at least 5 castles in play or have to sit out until u rebuild..no nap, no confederation....both main and alt must be in same alliance..no spying and each player signs a contract agreeing to what ever rules the league has...these of course just suggestions...gosh if there is enough peeps into it we could have lots of fun..think of it, six alliance playing strategy to dominant but a safety clause that enables  player not to lose everything. it be war of games of thrones, constant rebuilding so players can jump right back in....

Its 'war' only there is no diplomacy, sneaking around, spying, has 'rules', can't lose everything, time to rebuild ect.  

So its 'war' just take out everything that constitutes war.  

Personally I find this idea as being hilarious.  If there were 6 big alliances that wanted to make never ending war on the server, they probably could whether the rest of the server wanted to or not.  

I find it a bad idea to take all the people who want never ending war and put them in a system that forces them to work together and learn about war.    
Back to Top
Gemley View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 04:34
IF someone created this I know eventually one of the alliances will majorly break the rules, won't apologize and then start a war (it would be a no mercy deal) between the alliances and only one or two will be left standing.

It seems to me that the final result will be a lot of players rage quitting or getting seiged out of game. Sure it would be fun for most of the time but at the end of the I think the majority of affected players would not think it was worth it.
Just my two cents.
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.