Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Claims of Ignoration of Claims
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Claims of Ignoration of Claims

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 9>
Author
Gragnog View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gragnog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jul 2015 at 08:51
Perhaps I have gotten it all wrong but I am sure there has never been any mention of restricting any harvesting in areas that are claimed. Only the restriction of settling in the areas. Also all claims made by alliance leaders or representatives in forums should be marked on the map. If an alliance has said they will restrict any kind of player in any area it is the same as a land claim. Live with it. Keeping the map updated with information will ensure it is a reliable source of information for a long time.
Kaggen is my human half
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Angrim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jul 2015 at 12:46
Originally posted by Gragnog Gragnog wrote:

...all claims made by alliance leaders or representatives in forums should be marked on the map. If an alliance has said they will restrict any kind of player in any area it is the same as a land claim.
even assuming the moral equivalency of all claims (projected, declared), it's not going to be practical to mark and label every 10-square radius of every city on the map. thus the map cannot show "all claims made by alliance leaders or representatives in forums". many alliances have confirmed their support for the 10-square rule via the forum at one time or another.

restricting the map to claims alliance leaders have requested be placed there will keep it from becoming a political tool and from sliding into irrelevancy.


Edited by Angrim - 09 Jul 2015 at 12:47
Back to Top
Grego View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 09 May 2010
Location: Klek
Status: Offline
Points: 729
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Grego Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Jul 2015 at 14:22
LC will mostly affect individual players and small, independant alliances. Big ones will us it as excuse for conflicts, and middl will be squashing in between. I see Absa both big and small but would say we are middle.

Whatever your choice is, respect travelers and guests. At least for short :P
Back to Top
demdigs View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 570
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote demdigs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Jul 2015 at 19:49
There is a simple way for land claimers to keep there land claims, just claim the 150 sov squares that the game allows you to use, pay for the use of the land instead of having the cake and eating it to, they want the land claims to themselves and not wanting to pay for the land at all, so they make the claims and not even paying for it, hense wanting the cake and eating it to. 
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Jul 2015 at 21:14
That's a silly argument. 150 squares cannot cover the current 10 square radius. Are you suggesting that people need to give up the 10 square rule because they can't sov the entire area?
Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abstractdream Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2015 at 00:47
That's what he's saying...lol
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Angrim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2015 at 01:34
Originally posted by Brandmeister Brandmeister wrote:

150 squares cannot cover the current 10 square radius.
it would only have to cover a 5-square radius to enforce the spirit of the 10-square rule.
Back to Top
Alcie View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 308
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Alcie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2015 at 01:53
Originally posted by Brandmeister Brandmeister wrote:

That's a silly argument. 150 squares cannot cover the current 10 square radius. Are you suggesting that people need to give up the 10 square rule because they can't sov the entire area?


hmm...the cheapest 150 squares makes a radius 7...blob. If two towns each did that and faced each other, they would have to be 15 apart. Maybe we need the 15 square rule! :o As long as we all only sov 100, I think we may be safe-it is hard to easily pay for much more than 100 anyways.

Edited by Alcie - 28 Jul 2015 at 01:55
Back to Top
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Halcyon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2015 at 05:44
No reason to sov so much as the cost will be great and we can have no benefits from more than 20 squares.
Making a homeland is possible and not too hard using the 10 square convention: make sure that your towns are settled in 1 central location and close to each other. Even spaced 5 squares from each other, you can get all the sov you need. There are at least 2 alliances in BL that are doing this: the first, SIN, who added a land claim to an already well settled and established homeland; the second, Sojourn.


Edited by Halcyon - 28 Jul 2015 at 05:46
Back to Top
jcx View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 09 Oct 2013
Location: Tallimar
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jcx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2015 at 07:15
Originally posted by Diva Diva wrote:

What an EYE opener!! Beyljr!?!? you operate out of NS, a WOT based affiliate!?!? and claim --- And we are asking that you not try to restrict the way that we operate.

So all that we were thinking is true (and allowable), you represent both sides of the fence, well one side. I don't know your alt, but I know where the Beyljr account is.

 ... very revealing I must say.



 
I just learned that ~NS~ is now a WOT affiliate. LOL

Beyljr, don't forget you operate under ~NS~ a WOT affiliate.. watch your words.  Tongue
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.

jcx in H? | orcboy in H?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 9>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.