| Author |
 Topic Search
 Topic Options
|
Sisren 
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446 |
 Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 01:32 |
Terms of Surrender should not be confused with a peace treaty or armistice. Surrender does not imply peace, rather in many cases it implies the opposite.
To, after several weeks and into months after accepting one surrenders, to wait while the person surrendered to is busy elsewhere, simply say 'I am not doing this' will have repercussions for your current and future dealings.
You will be viewed as someone that will not keep their word.
We have but a few currencies here - integrity, trust, and competence. Are you enriching yourself in doing this?
|
 |
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550 |
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 02:04 |
 Rill wrote:
This topic currently has no topic, since Thor took it down. I'm sure when he feels like raising the issue again, he will post another topic. Or, if he is wise, he will just let the extensive discussion of this issue on other topics speak for him and drop the issue entirely. At any rate, I don't want EF to be distracted from the actual in-game problem of a small town being hit by 40 siege engines that TLR has promised to withdraw. |
I tried defending my case on GC tonight when I saw you talking about the villainous scoundrels TLR in there again, but it fell on deaf ears. I'm unsure as to why I'm expected to comment on this matter if my comments are not believed.
I shall try once more,
Fromfrak has not been online at all today, she is not online therefor she can not recall her siege with messengers. She does not have a sitter therefor we can not get on and recall her siege. We do not have anyone close enough with enough firepower to eliminate her siege once leaving TLR for 6 hours, we do not appear to have anyone near Gemley to break the siege that is not affiliated with TLR. Gemley does not appear to have the manpower to break the siege.
However much TLR wants the siege to be recalled, we can not. Feel free to continue crucifying us on GC but just know we can't.
Gemley asked me if he would receive anything for the damages received to his city under siege, i assured him he would receive millions in gold to which he responded to with "thanks". I take that as a Gemley the Dwarf seal of approval and added in building resources to help rebuild. GC is of course allowed to demand cities of 28k population, or 50k population, or a Ferrari.
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 |
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 02:14 |
|
just two 28k pop cities and a Ferrari, please.
|
|
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586 |
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 02:20 |
ES2 wrote:
Rill wrote:
Oh, by all means, try to start something with TRO. You broke the treaty -- if you want to start another war, that's on you. But carry out your promise and stop the siege first. |
I do not wish to start something with TRO, I am simple making sure that he understands he accepted the Terms of his alliances Surrender, it is not my fault he did not check to see if the Terms of his alliances Surrender would be void if The Long Road attacked anything wearing The Red Order tag.
I have promised Mona Lisa, (eom) Harry and Gemley that I am doing everything in my power to cease the siege on Gemley the Dwarf [TOR]. I have promised Gemley I would help rebuild his damaged city and pay him a few million in gold, I have promised Harry and Mona that while I do not have sitting access to FromFrak[TLR] who has the siege out against Gemley, that messages have been sent to her to recall her siege against Gemley.
|
EF is telling the truth, and he has promised to pay for damages. Please stop bringing me up in this thread, as much as I am touched by it I intend to not become another joke topic on the forums
|
|
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
|
|
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586 |
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 02:27 |
BTW: EF my friend Naxos has hired some mercs and he is willing to send them to destroy the seige, which I have told him to do because honestly I don't want too much damage done to my city.
To my fellow harvesters that I stood up for; to my knowledge it has been decided that the two mines fought over will be spilt, one going to us and the other to fromfrak. In the next few days hopefully our peaceful harvesting can continue. Hopefully fromfrak has learned her lesson and will not try to take our mine otherwise I would have to kill another 7/8 k stalwarts
Edited by Gemley - 26 Sep 2012 at 03:14
|
|
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550 |
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 02:29 |
Thats fine, in fact I welcome it. TLR will pay for the money required.
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Fromfrak
New Poster
Joined: 30 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 35 |
Posted: 27 Sep 2012 at 19:52 |
Gemley wrote:
BTW: EF my friend Naxos has hired some mercs and he is willing to send them to destroy the seige, which I have told him to do because honestly I don't want too much damage done to my city.
To my fellow harvesters that I stood up for; to my knowledge it has been decided that the two mines fought over will be spilt, one going to us and the other to fromfrak. In the next few days hopefully our peaceful harvesting can continue. Hopefully fromfrak has learned her lesson and will not try to take our mine otherwise I would have to kill another 7/8 k stalwarts
|
Nice gloating. You never had rights to the mine. You still do not.
|
|
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 |
Posted: 28 Sep 2012 at 04:15 |
|
Fromfrak, I advise you not to go back on TLR's agreement with HUGcr and TOR. If you attempt to interfere with their harvesting on the agreed-upon mine, there will be consequences.
|
|
Juswin
Wordsmith
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Location: Philippines
Status: Offline
Points: 119 |
Posted: 28 Sep 2012 at 05:36 |
|
LOL fromfrak now trying to wrest away a mine from another player? Nasty. These guys don't learn.
|
It may be that you are right. Then again, you may be wrong.
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550 |
Posted: 28 Sep 2012 at 14:01 |
Rill wrote:
Fromfrak, I advise you not to go back on TLR's agreement with HUGcr and TOR. If you attempt to interfere with their harvesting on the agreed-upon mine, there will be consequences. |
She belongs to Dlords now, she is no longer TLR.
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Tweet
Changed topic.