Attaching Skinners/Cotters to Armies |
Post Reply |
Page 123> |
| Author | |
Demonic Spoon
New Poster Joined: 12 Jun 2014 Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Topic: Attaching Skinners/Cotters to ArmiesPosted: 01 Jul 2014 at 11:57 |
|
(Credit for idea goes to Duuvian)
It would save a lot of hassle if we could attach skinners and cotters to armies that are sent out to exterminate animals, so that they can begin harvesting immediately. Basically, when you send out the army, having the option to attach harvesters, and once the animals are destroyed the harvesters detach and start scooping up those hides/anatomies while your army returns to escort the next waiting batch of harvesters to the next horde of wolves etc. Avoids the hassle of having to send out an additional order for the harvesters to go there, and since they start harvesting immediately less resources should be lost, theoretically speaking. I don't recall if cotter speed is too low for this to be workable, but theoretically you could also attach them to armies engaging other armies so they can scavenge the battlefield for items afterwards? Thoughts? Edited by Demonic Spoon - 01 Jul 2014 at 11:58 |
|
![]() |
|
DaniSuper
New Poster Joined: 15 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 30 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 01 Jul 2014 at 16:09 |
|
I am greatly in favour of this suggestion. I cant sometimes login again to check if my army has hit and then send cotters/skinners to collect the valuable hides etc on the spot. I am sure there are few other players who face similar problem because of real life getting in the way, by allowing the option of attaching the skinners and cotters, It will make it much easier for us to get full benefit of the resources dropped on the spot.
|
|
![]() |
|
dantem
Greenhorn Joined: 21 Apr 2014 Location: The Room Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 01 Jul 2014 at 16:36 |
|
It is a decent idea, but some problems I see are
1. Players losing harvesters because they do not scout the enemy/ players forgetting they have harvesters in their army and sending it to a fight
2. Kills near other player cities will cause problems, especially with the widely accepted 5 sq harvest rule
But apart from these I think your idea is very nice!
|
|
|
I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sheza
Forum Warrior Joined: 16 Oct 2012 Location: Kumala Status: Offline Points: 325 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Jul 2014 at 00:08 |
|
I like this too .
|
|
|
If Horses don't go to Heaven when they die. then I want to go where they go.
|
|
![]() |
|
jcx
Forum Warrior Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 04 Jul 2014 at 12:33 |
|
Lazy crafters..
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
jcx in H? | orcboy in H? |
|
![]() |
|
dantem
Greenhorn Joined: 21 Apr 2014 Location: The Room Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 05 Jul 2014 at 07:43 |
|
lol jcx...true, but if you are going to hunt npc's just for the animal parts, this is a brilliant idea....
|
|
|
I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.
|
|
![]() |
|
Bukama
New Poster Joined: 30 May 2014 Location: Holland Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 19:17 |
|
I see just two problems with this:
1) if you lose the battle or some of the critters live you lose your harvesters too. 2) you can only have one type of harvester at work on a square at a time |
|
![]() |
|
Demonic Spoon
New Poster Joined: 12 Jun 2014 Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 21 Jul 2014 at 07:31 |
1) I assumed that would just have to be a risk involved with attaching harvesters to a army. More convenient, but also somewhat riskier. 2) Solved easily enough by only being able to attach one type of harvester to the army at a time. |
|
![]() |
|
Glin
Wordsmith Joined: 06 Apr 2014 Location: US Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 22 Jul 2014 at 01:06 |
|
Very expensive, losing skinners.
|
|
![]() |
|
Arctic55
Forum Warrior Joined: 26 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 379 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 22 Jul 2014 at 03:35 |
|
I would like to go on record to say, I like this idea.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply |
Page 123> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |