An Open letter to H? rank and file

Anymore insults to each and I'll close the thread. Just stick to war chat and leave real-life out of it.

Maybe Hath did taunt Kumo in his very first sentence. That was wrong. That's why (imo) none of you guys should be talking together. There is too much in the past that have made you angry and the good words are ignored - or read in a wrong way - which results in the thoughts of ones brain becoming hostile... which then brings out bad things, mmkay.

*editted gibberish paragraphs*

Facts remain
GA won't stop sieges until terms are negotiated.
GA have reached out with terms that are reasonable. If terms are not accepted due to whatever reason, please counter.
NAAM are not going to pay an escrow, since they were actually joined the war defending a confed from you guys, which they took seriously and felt the need to lend a helping hand. That is exactly what you did too. The fact that they are still in the war, is because they are some persistent fellas, as well as many other good things.
H? say that the terms are not going to be honored, because some other terms were altered at another time. *edit: what other time was it, please clarify* Let's put that behind us now, because this time it is a lot more serious and it is somewhat about the future of Illyriad.

I personally don't want to see Harmless destroyed down to the last new settled towns, that you will most likely keep spamming, with resources fed from accounts not in H. etc etc. You will do everything in your power to not die, which is understandable..

Edited by DeliciousJosh - 28 Jun 2014 at 21:49

Regarding escrow there is an easy and simple solution to me to that issue both side's pay the same amount to an netural and mutual agreeable alliance for both alliance or one for each payment ( say h pays 2 billion to alliance X and GA to alliance Z ) for an agreed upon period.  if peace turns are broken then the gold is forfeit.

Edited by King korr - 28 Jun 2014 at 22:20

Yes, SunStorm that is pretty accurate. We know about their stance and somewhat which strategy they have in place. Basically, we are informing the community about ongoins, as well as starting this debate to hopefully bring us closer to peace. The answers they have given so far in this thread are obvious. So are the IGM's I have recieved after sending this link of terms to all members of H.. They won't back down. They won't agree to anything. They are prepared to die.

And Korr, that is a good idea. I'm sure the GA would accept a situation like that, paying to a neutral and trusted alliance.

KillerPoodle wrote: I'm doing the same - our members just have more balls than yours.

Well said ... and this is imho the whole point to the matter ... they want a surrender for various reasons :

• So that they can look good and benevolent even after wiping out whole accounts. This topic has this exact point and no other.
• They want to finally make us surrender so that they can gloat afterwards and start various accusations like they did in my case for example.
• They want H? to stick around and use it like a "scarecrow" so that their "not so stable" alliance gathering does not crumble and fight amongst each other. Without another powerhouse in the game like H? such frictions are inevitable, especially after the "funny" events of the last tournament

After all those years and all those previous posts and topics where such issues where thouroghly explained they just cannot think that we are actually that gullible or bereft of memory, so my guess is that this topic is not really addressed towards H? and its members.
 
I can only hope that the real "target group" of this topic can see through such obvious beautification efforts ...