Alliance Leadership on abandonment |
Post Reply  |
Page <1 567 |
| Author | |
Dungshoveleux 
Postmaster  Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply  Posted: 09 Feb 2016 at 18:34 |
|
The more I think about it, alliance leaders with sole superuser rights who don't log in at least once per 30 days should be subject to superuser rights rolling down to the next level. If an alliance superuser can't be assed to log in at least once per month then they shouldn't be leader?
Edited by Dungshoveleux - 09 Feb 2016 at 21:39 |
|
 |
|
| Fyzz
New Poster   Joined: 02 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 18 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 09 Feb 2016 at 18:40 |
|
The problem as described relate to the leader of an alliance exceeding 90 days but then towns 'held' in limbo by holding sieges causing a problem with alliance roles - why don't you just drop all alliance roles on the 'abandonment' flag and leave the rest as is.
|
|
|
|
| Brandmeister
Postmaster General   Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 09 Feb 2016 at 19:41 |
|
Well, dropping all alliance roles upon the abandonment flag getting set would make it obvious to everyone that the account is inactive. I would expect lots of thieves. Personally I would be okay with just automatically dropping the player from the alliance itself.
|
|
|
|
| Silea
New Poster  Joined: 09 Feb 2016 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 31 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 09 Feb 2016 at 21:06 |
|
I might be new to Illyriad but in reading all these posts I thought I would give my two cents. It looks like we have to seperate issues. One account abandonment ane two leadership abandonment.
I tend to agree long account sitting is a problem but i also think that siezing a nice pretty city is nice. I think that at 90 days the marked abandoned city goes into degrade mode is the solution that makes the most sense. It would give incentive to hurry the siezure but also give time for guild to movenin equipment. For leadership abandonment at 90 days leadership is forfeit an auto email goes out oon the group next down on list and the choice is left up to vote. Maybe each capiol city gets a token and you send it.to the capitol of the leader you want. The person who gets the most tokens is new.leader. |
|
|
|
| Mr Damage
Postmaster  Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 09 Feb 2016 at 21:35 |
|
Leave the incoming army scenario as is, if people want to bother extending an account's life that way then good for them. The alliance leader situation, remove from leadership after 90 days inactivity and promote next in line. Members not wanting to wait this long in player abandonment cases can always petition the devs for a shorter solution. Perhaps a player abandoning should automatically lose leadership role when doing so?
|
|
|
|
| JimJams
Forum Warrior   Joined: 20 Sep 2011 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 13 Feb 2016 at 14:43 |
|
90 days are NOTHING in this game
Assuming a small-medium alliance have about 30 players, you can get a lot more than 90 days to reallocate 10 or more cities. Players have to grow to get another city.
So, let's say the truth, this is all over forcing people to buy prestige, so they can grow faster and take the cities.
My call? Make the game working well and quicken its neverending nevercompleting nevercommiting development if you want more money from us.
Or just continue with BS and deal with people abandoning or virtually abandoning this game, as it is happening in the last 2-3 years.
Don't call me rude, I was kind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Post Reply |
Page <1 567 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options