All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance |
Post Reply |
Page <12345 10> |
| Author | ||||||
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 16:50 |
|||||
|
I honestly can't see any end to a conflict like this without some kind of mutual, bilateral agreement. We don't have to call it surrender if you don't want to, but I doubt anyone is just going to head off and give their opponents their backs.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
But that's the exact definition off...
Oh nevermind.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Elmindra
Forum Warrior Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 16:54 |
|||||
We only lost as many towns as we did because of the fact that we were smart enough to exodus isolated towns out of harms way from an early time and because we decided to surrender under the threat of total destruction.
Check players like Hannibal or Alagos or Bellus or many others than went from well over 100k population down to almost nothing due to forced exodus and/or more than 3 towns lost. Or the constant threats of "you lose another town because we don't like how you talk in GC or the forums" or "my goal is to get people to leave the game, that's how you win" or "not so wise now huh". I declared early on that the Consone war was not a war we could win, and only because of that realization and our decision to both exodus to regroup into the north and the fact that we decided to surrender before complete destruction is the only reason there is a distinction between us.
Sure your side has lost many more towns than we did in the last war, but that is of your own doing. Ask the people who did surrender, no where did we force them to continue losing towns as part of surrender terms. Many of you were given an out very early on with the ability to lose little to no towns as a price. You on the other hand forced us to choose between losing towns daily and an increasing number of towns as part of terms, or to simply accept the 37 towns we were forced to allow you to raze as part of our settlement terms.
Personally I have no problem removing your towns one at a time until they are completely gone from history, but don't come on here and preach that you are high and mighty and somehow better. I am here for vengence, that is something that you have created and now have to live with.
|
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Halcyon
Forum Warrior Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Israel Status: Offline Points: 360 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 16:54 |
|||||
Time to try and put a stop to this myth.
A certain Vicx player had cities in Dark territory during the Coalition-Consone war. An agreement was struck with Vicx leadership that he remains out of the war but there was a miscommunication inside Vicx and the player himself was not notified of the deal. As a result he attacked Dark sieges on a Vic player. Thinking that he broke his promise Dark proceeded to siege or capture all his cities in Dark area. I believe that he Exodused one or two cities. Talks with Vicx leadership at the time did not reveal the mixup and the real facts were made known to us only months later after that war ended.
H? indeed approached Dark to say to ease up on him, but no one actually stopped us since at the time we were sure that he had went back on his word.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Starry
Postmaster Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 612 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 17:23 |
|||||
|
Interesting, since your posts indicate that you agreed with the Coalition's stance but went on to siege another city. (Starry is thankful we keep all data relating to past wars).
Irregardless, the point of our limit was the continuation of the game; sieging players out the game is short sighted and, in the long run, bad for the game. While I realize that many players have different view about the viability and continuation of this game, others may want to continue playing. After four years of building, starting over and pouring more money into a game with enemies that will hunt you for your game life, is not an option for many players. No, I do not think our enemies will allow H to rebuild, in spite of their claims.
Edit: Elmindra, your post is filled with so many falsehoods, I'm not going to bother replying but I challenge you to post verifiable examples of H threatening any player with additional loss of cities once peace was secured.
For the general public: We have always consider exodus as a tool to save a city and it has been used by both sides not only in the Consone war but this war too. There is a big difference between rebuilding an exodused city and starting from scratch. If you use prestige and have resources available, you can rebuild completely in days.
Edited by Starry - 02 Mar 2014 at 17:30 |
||||||
|
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless? "Truth never dies." -HonoredMule |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Deranzin
Postmaster Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 17:43 |
|||||
Funny indeed ... because: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ignorant because ignorance is LACK of knowledge on an issue and definitely not when you have DIFFERENT knowledge on that issue ... so you are actually laughing while being mistaken ...
|
||||||
Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Elmindra
Forum Warrior Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 17:59 |
|||||
I never said you threatened these things once peace was secured, I stated you and your lot threatened these things and did in fact act on it when you could BEFORE peace was secured by us accepting a surrender.
I have IGM's from leadership of TCol and BSH at the time stating as much, as well as from H? leadership and also from your so called embassy (outside forum) which you force all enemies to come and grovel to in order to accept surrender terms. I will not post any of this because it is against Illy terms of use to do such things.
As for that, if it were up to me you are correct. But, decisions such as this are not up to me.
Edited by Elmindra - 02 Mar 2014 at 18:01 |
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
John Louis
Greenhorn Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 99 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:11 |
|||||
|
I am very grateful to all the helpful comments here, I can see some players are genuinely considering where we go from here.
With respect, I would like to discuss the following points: @ Halcyon – nothing prevents me from personally surrendering, except my values. I am exploring the remote possibility that both Team A and B may want an end to this war. Given that Team A has already lost more than that the losers from past wars – what does Team B hope to gain other than the personal satisfaction of making past enemies surrender to them. In my view, this is pure revenge (plain and simple). So I suggest, put personal vendettas to one side and negotiate a real peace that will satisfy everybody – this is within sight, the moment is here, both sides just need to take a leap of faith and grab that opportunity before it is gone. It is clear, however, that surrender is just not possible, it is not even clear at this point what surrender would mean. Team B already has its pound of flesh, if you take any more there really will be nothing left of Team A (and most say that they do not want an Illy without Team A – so ball is in Team B's court). Poetically speaking, I now quote Lauren Hill, "What you want might make you cry, but what you need might pass you by, if you don't catch it...". The time for real peace is upon us, don't let it pass us by! @ Jenin – thank you for your comments, however, I cannot agree with your assertions. Some may think that I am just spewing rhetoric, but I am trying to be genuine. I have been in NC many years, I have never seen them bully anybody...unless you include harassing bullies themselves. NC does harass bullies such as alliances/individuals trying to force Newbs to do as they say. Jenin, you compare NC to Black, but have you seen your own alliance's page? BANE is a mercenary alliance, you are currently under contract, its here for all to see: http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/#/Alliance/Alliance/760 . In Latin we say res ipsa loquitur (not the Illy alliance, I should point out, but the words mean "the thing speaks for itself"). Perhaps you need to start with the man (or woman) looking back at you in the mirror before making these types of accusations against NC. But, irrespective of points of view, I do hope we can work with one another at finding a true and lasting peace, that is what this post is about after all – are you prepared to discuss that without flinging ideological arguments about and making a huge mess in the process? @ Mahaut & Rill – Rill, maybe I am mistaken but I thought I saw a post of yours (now deleted methinks) arguing like Mahaut that my words regarding a scorched earth policy were ridiculous and even hurtful. Rill, if I am mistaken I apologize and then this reply is only meant for Mahaut. Please do not take what I say personally, however, this game is a community (perhaps like the International Community in real life) and there is a war element, especially at this moment in time. Accordingly, analogies to real life war situations are only natural and appropriate. If you have been traumatized as a result of real life experiences, or wars going on in real life that you see in the news, maybe you need to take a step back. I have friends who have experienced real life wars and they are nowhere near as sensitive as some people who make accusatory posts in Illy. This is a game, and words are just words (most of the time). It makes for interesting reading, however, so long as people are not hypersensitive all of the time. @ Spheniscidae – This war need not drag on unless and until one side surrenders – Ceasefire is a perfectly reasonable alternative. It opens the way for discussions in good faith and may bring about a more lasting peace than a much resented surrender (this resented surrender has happened before, which is why we are where we are now). Also, I will write whatever I feel I should write, you are not my editor or censor so don't read what I have to say if it upsets you so very much. @ Elmindra – wow, you must be one of the few who actually admit your participation in this war is about vengeance. Thank you for your honesty, I guess, though you say nothing which is conducive towards a peace settlement. Finally, I think I should reiterate – Team B has criticized the peace terms prepared by Team A in past wars. If they genuinely believe this was so bad, why are they following the example of Team A. The world is in your hands, you think you can create a better Illy – well, show us the way. Lead by example instead of following what Team A has done in the past. You certainly have the capacity to take the lead/initiative from here on. Prove Team A wrong, show them you can be trusted, that you do want peace – that there can be a better Illyriad. If Team B can usher in a Golden Age for Illyriad through a peace written in good faith and good acts instead of the blood of Team A, now is the time to do it...I dare you! |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Arian
Wordsmith Joined: 11 Nov 2011 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:11 |
|||||
|
Starry is missing the point.
Unilateral rules posted by Honoured Mule or Killer Poodle and not agreed to in advance by any other party are just propaganda. People fighting H? and allies in the Consone war didn't lose more than 3 cities because they either moved out of harms way, left their alliance and sought individual surrender terms or the entire alliance SURRENDERED before it got to that point, not because of any perceived sense of fairness or otherwise on the part of H? and friends - and some were threatened with losing everything - so I'm not sure what the difference is between then and now that everyone keeps alluding to. It's all very simple and straightforward. Nothing in Illy warfare has changed in any way. You fight until one side surrenders at which point reparations are made and it all stops till the next war. No amount of spin will change things - if a player or an alliance surrenders no more cities will be lost so it's entirely THEIR choice - by not doing so they are actually forcing things to continue the way they are. |
||||||
|
'Do you want ice with that?'
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Mahaut
Wordsmith Joined: 20 Jan 2012 Location: North West UK Status: Offline Points: 173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:21 |
|||||
|
John Louis My problems in repetitive allusion to a real life war situation stem from the Consone war when players allied to H? started using terms like War Criminal and calling people Nazi's and in one somewhat disreputable case calling a member of Consone leadership by the same name as a Nazi war criminal.
I find this sort of thing extremely distasteful and there is no reason to do it whatsoever. This IS a war game on a computer if people don't want to lose pixel cities then they shouldn't go to war or should leave their alliance.
This is not real life.
|
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Jenin
New Poster Joined: 16 Dec 2011 Location: Philadelphia Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:26 |
|||||
So .?. Do your actions reflect your whole side .?. By that measure I broke the truce with my vCrow neighbor over this exact matter (him attacking small accounts) ... so should I then claim that everyone from my side had the same ideas like you do .?. I think that such an idea does not hold water ... Plus, you said that you were ordered to attack a small player and asked to be excluded from it ... I find this honorable for you, but doesn't this imply that someone else carried on with those orders .?.
Deranzin, after I noticed the above, I wrote to leadership and made it clear that we did not need to go that low, that attacks be between similarly sized players and also that we would somehow need to make peace one day...I am not sure quite how any of this has applied lately because I have ben a bit out of the loop since the winter started with a great deal of work and RL family drama. I only know what I see and report it...
Maybe, but I didn't claim that no small account was ever attacked by my side because I do not know that for a fact. You, however, did falsely proclaim that.
There is nothing false about the charts of cities my players had a month after the NC-Bane war started and the IGM's I have expressing their worries about time constraints in real life and the degrees of being attacked by NC players. Since this is NOT a false accusation & Sir Bradley has expressed denial, he and I are now going over these events - I do not believe that you have enough inside knowledge to refute my accusation, so I think perhaps it's time you drop the indignation over the fact that NC did INDEED attack newbs and also had NS involved in the million troops pile up as illustrated here:
http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/awesome-war-happening-where-to-get-infor_topic5132_page2.html
Myr's commanders & troops are clearly visible, she was the leader of a training alliance at the time and it gave a lot of us grave misgivings about the blurring between support and direct participation between parent and training alliance.
BANE was, and still is iirc, this game's only military force for hire ... since when they are traders I know not, but your own alliance profile page says : "Current status: Hired, under contract."
Unless you meant that you were selling troops ... but that expands a bit the concept of this game's trading, wouldn't you say .?.
Yes, It certainly does and that was exactly our intent - and it was FUN! we knew NOTHING about war in here...
If you are not aware of the pre-war Hathaldir's post calling for revenge and having gathered many people with him for it, then this is not my fault. Apart from that, if it was " about NC" I would like your explanation why NC are amongst the last people standing and others (even in map positions unrelated to NC) where attacked first and foremost, like TVM for example. Also, calling people ignorant just because they happen to have some different facts from you, is a bit of a bad form imho ...
You are ignorant of the facts, Warren Gabriel attacked every newb near him and NC did as well after the NC-Bane war started. I have our city charts and their IGM's begging for help - Sir Bradley & I will be going over those soon.
So, you went to stop the "nastiness" by taking it to new unprecedented levels .?.
I'll keep that in mind while my account is reduced to rubble
(I am not being ironic, I really find that comment amusing)
I kept my account from becoming rubble by not getting over-zelous about my position and took surrender - you are free to do the same
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Post Reply |
Page <12345 10> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |