Actions against Myll of [Wave] |
Post Reply |
Page <1 34567 11> |
| Author | ||
Bimoda
Wordsmith Joined: 04 Jun 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 02:04 |
|
|
I understand how some may look at it as extreme. But the complete unwillingness to discuss moving the cities and the firm stance that they will continue to do it regardless of what anyone else expects put an end to our negotiating the point. We could have like some have said, escalated in steps. Used diplomatic attacks, but what are thieves/spies/assassins really going to accomplish? Plus, we had no desire to drag their whole alliance into a back and forth that would carry on and on. This is what would have happened if we started going after the individual towns.
Myll declared on his alliances profile that they are Not a peaceful alliance. He says that they will wage war when beneficial to their claims. How is using the same kind of force that they propose on their alliance page so far out of order? Especially, since we are limiting our penalty to the one player who is promoting the issue.
|
||
|
Bimoda - Dragon Fairy: Illyria Fairy Nation [FAIRY]
|
||
![]() |
||
DeliciousJosh
Forum Warrior Joined: 14 Jun 2012 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 03:17 |
|
|
I disagree with my alliances policy about the 10square "rule", Bimoda. What to do?
I think you should stop the siege on Myll. |
||
|
PublicRelations HumanResources |
||
![]() |
||
Brandmeister
Postmaster General Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 03:21 |
|
|
I don't really understand the logic of this argument. At first you condemned WAVE's actions for being outside the community accepted norms of Illyriad. Then, when people were critical of your raze intentions (which are
also outside community accepted norms), you justify them by speculating about the meaning of statements on WAVE's alliance profile. If the entire cornerstone of your justification is the violation of community consensus, then violating community consensus seems like an awfully strange way to proceed.
I have no particular objection to you flattening this dude. I object to the elaborate dog-and-pony shows that seem to be part of Illyriad warfare. Brids is right, this should have been done quietly and without forum posts. I've rarely seen anything positive come from PR-style statements on the forums. |
||
![]() |
||
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 05:11 |
|
|
Your stance here seems to be drifting more and more toward you not liking what was written on their alliance profile. I'm just not convinced that's a valid reason to siege people.
This would, I'm pretty sure, have made it into public debate anyway, when the siege notifications came up, if nothing else.
|
||
![]() |
||
RorschachRev
New Poster Joined: 22 May 2012 Location: at home Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 05:34 |
|
|
What's to discuss? penalize the offending player and if his alliance wants to alter his behavior as a means of protecting him from his consequences then by all means, discuss it between alliances. Raze away - but be willing to allow the player to move his city as he should have in the first place. Lesson learned, on with life.
|
||
![]() |
||
Angrim
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 06:17 |
|
so if Myll is actually playing, one might hope that he will take notice and make some response. if he is not, Fairy might raze everything he has and still have no remedy to the offence... |
||
![]() |
||
TanyaFairy
New Poster Joined: 16 May 2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 06:29 |
|
|
Hi Everyone
no, the alliance has been told that if they still refuse to move the city or even negotiate about it we will next target Myll's alt. After that we will target the next alliance leader....whoever that may be.
Tanya
|
||
![]() |
||
Steven Quincy Urpel
Wordsmith Joined: 06 May 2014 Location: OUTER (SPACE) Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 07:22 |
|
|
WAVE does not appear to have any veteran accounts other than Myll's, so you might wanna reconsider your options if you wipe out his cities and nothing comes of it. Just my two cents.
|
||
|
They call me MISTER Urp!
|
||
![]() |
||
bansisdead
Postmaster Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 07:56 |
|
So are you solely targeting Myll or not? You seem to be saying two different things. |
||
![]() |
||
Kurgar
New Poster Joined: 18 May 2014 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 09:41 |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply |
Page <1 34567 11> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |