Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Actions against Myll of [Wave]
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Actions against Myll of [Wave]

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 91011
Author
Bimoda View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 121
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bimoda Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Aug 2014 at 07:22
But if you read the later posts you will see that Gaia disputed our statement that she was following Myll's directions and was responsible for her own actions.
Bimoda - Dragon Fairy: Illyria Fairy Nation [FAIRY]
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Angrim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Aug 2014 at 13:17
Originally posted by Bimoda Bimoda wrote:

Wave has already been informed that this siege will be recalled.
it will be clear to any of us monitoring this situation that either there is no one in Fairy who can make policy for the entire alliance or it is the policy of Fairy to keep WAVE on edge with regard to how long sieges will continue and on what basis. Fairy has razed six cities over this matter, none of which were in any sense in violation of the 10 square rule. TanyaFairy declared in gc that the matter was resolved and Gaia's city would be allowed to stay *before* Bimoda proceeded to siege it...because WAVE (having thought the matter concluded) had no desire to talk further or make additional concessions after the matter had been resolved per Fairy's leadership.

i am on the other side of the world, and ultimately what happens in the northwest of Elgea must be the concern of its residents. but i am also a strong proponent of the 10 square rule, and for its sake it must be considered now that the 10 square rule is being used as a decoy for a more expansive policy by Fairy involving an offer for WAVE members to join Fairy and the systematic destruction of WAVE resources it uses to support newbs and otherwise function as a viable recruiting alliance. the six cities mentioned were Myll's. i bear him no love for his reckless opposition to a generally beneficial understanding between alliances, but Fairy has used the opportunity to destroy his account, by their own word to ensure that he cannot return to the game and "lead others astray". i find this entire justification objectionable. but beyond that, even H?, which at the time was unassailable as a military power, only ever claimed for themselves the right to remove the offending city with regard to their 10 square policy.

imo, Fairy has been amply paid for this infraction in the taking of six of the largest cities available to the WAVE alliance, an alliance which it well knows cannot mount any credible defence against it. let it leave off further sieges and let TanyaFairy's word to gc stand in this matter. if WAVE fails to learn cause and effect from the experience, there will be another day to see it through.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 91011
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.