Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - A new exodus marking "rule"?
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Topic ClosedA new exodus marking "rule"?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
Author
threefoothree View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Location: tampa, florida
Status: Offline
Points: 88
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 13:36
is there a time limit a army can hold a square?
if not, what stops a player or a alliance sending out lots of 1 troop army and commander to 20 spots all over the board and "reserving" 20 or 30 nice spots or a player with 4 cities tries to reserve the next 6 spots he wants his new cities to be.  all he would have to do is send more 1 army troops before occupy before the other leaves.
i agree if you got all your cities in a area and you dont want someone to mess up your plans in your area your building out, but i dont believe in holding markers for long periods of time across the map that your hoping to spread into. 
Back to Top
The_Dude View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 14:55
3f3 makes a good point about players "abusing" the marking system by marking far more than they can actually use in a reasonable period of time.  But is that any different than "10 sqs rule"?  After all, a key aspect to the 10 sqs claim is "future releases" _might_ make that area useful to a city.
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 16:22
In response to Scorpain's question about marking armies to reserve a space for a Tenaril move:  Because the move is instant, there should be little need for a marking army. In fact, you cannot Tenaril a city to a square that is occupied by an army.  Putting a marking army on a square to which you want to Tenaril soon(tm) falls under the same category as putting a marking army on a square you want to settle or Exodus soon(tm).

Just my two cents.
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 16:39
I have seen several players use this technique when they are thousands of population away from their next settlement. To me, this technique is only valid if you will initiate exodus or settlement within a day or two. It's actually a courtesy to your new neighbors because it gives them a day to notify you of objections... and it's generally polite to IGM the nearest players prior to your departure.

I feel it's unreasonable to expect players to treat an army in the middle of an empty field the same as they would treat an established city with a 10 square radius. I also agree with Meagh--if you Tenaril to a spot, it's yours by definition. Possession is nine tenths the law, and the 10 square halo was obviously respected. Objecting to a teleport after the fact is a moot point, and if forcible removal is threatened, that's the same as initiating hostilities for other typical reasons (ownership of rare resources, etc.). Implying that people are responsible to scout armies is passive behavior--if you want a square, take ownership the traditional way. Or just sov a 5x5 area to block incoming settlements.

Generally I think if you want a location, then settle it. If you want to own a square, sov it. Then ownership is clear and cannot be disputed because it was implied but not established.
Back to Top
Epidemic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 768
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 17:56
I've seen this technique used a few times and I agree that its a dumb move.

I've read of players saying you should notify your neighbors when you plan on placing a new town, but I've never gotten a message from any player invading my 10x10 spaces.

I guess it only works if you have a big alliance to back up your claims...
Back to Top
Darkwords View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 18:16
No Epi it works if someone moves within 10 squares radius of your city, where as you are referring to someone moving 10.5 squares from your city, in which case you did not need to be contacted.
Back to Top
Kumomoto View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 18:43
Originally posted by Darkwords Darkwords wrote:

No Epi it works if someone moves within 10 squares radius of your city, where as you are referring to someone moving 10.5 squares from your city, in which case you did not need to be contacted.


qft
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 18:46
Originally posted by Rill Rill wrote:

In response to Scorpain's question about marking armies to reserve a space for a Tenaril move:  Because the move is instant, there should be little need for a marking army. In fact, you cannot Tenaril a city to a square that is occupied by an army.  Putting a marking army on a square to which you want to Tenaril soon(tm) falls under the same category as putting a marking army on a square you want to settle or Exodus soon(tm).

Just my two cents.

And then you raze the town, so your actual city can land on the sq.  So yes there is significant time where it would need to be marked.  

The rule is very simple the same way people mark cities they intend to siege with armies.  I'm guessing if you don't accept one you don't accept the other. 

Just be ready to fight for it, and don't cry bully when the person's marking army you just wiped out is actually 10x as big as you are and wipes you out.  Because if I went found a nice spot marked  it with an army, maybe made it better via teleport.  Then someone else comes along wipes out my marking army and claims it as there own.  You can bet i'll turn around and raze their city so I can settle whats rightfully mine.
Back to Top
Auraya View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 523
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 19:32
I think you have misunderstood a point.. when choosing exodus/ tele locations for newbies, it is usual practice for both spots to be chose. At once, so they are in close proximity to each other. Since you can only move one city at once, whilst exodus is in motion you cannot teleport in. This means a marking army is required, so the spot is not lost during exodus - as exodus can take a week or so to land, Q&S members can be holding spots for a short while. I don't think this is unreasonable practice and in response to this thread, I have updated our alliance page.

I wish to make it clear, Q&S members do adhere to this rule both ways - we will scout any camps in the area and mail the owners to check the intentions but we do expect this to work both ways.
Back to Top
Epidemic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 768
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Mar 2013 at 22:23
Originally posted by Darkwords Darkwords wrote:

No Epi it works if someone moves within 10 squares radius of your city, where as you are referring to someone moving 10.5 squares from your city, in which case you did not need to be contacted.


Actually it was 10.05 squares in the last instance. It has been too long to remember the other 6 instances i'm also referring to.

What is qft?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.