30JUL15 - 1WK NOTICE: NPC AI & DIPLO CHANGE |
Post Reply |
Page <1 56789 10> |
| Author | |
Endrok
Wordsmith Joined: 12 May 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Aug 2015 at 10:18 |
Thanks for the update.
Will the faction troops take action against existing camps or only new ones that arrive after the change ?
Endrok
|
|
![]() |
|
TheBillPN
Forum Warrior Joined: 03 Jun 2014 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 305 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Aug 2015 at 14:28 |
|
anyone been attacked yet?
thought i saw an attack earlier :
but actually stopped here:
on top of some harvesters...
|
|
![]() |
|
Endrok
Wordsmith Joined: 12 May 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Aug 2015 at 15:19 |
|
I have 2 camps in the area around The Tower ... no attacks yet.
If no attacks on those 2 camps by morning then I'll be recalling them.
I have a 3rd army on the way to see if it needs an army that camps after the code change ..... just in case the AI ignores camps already in the area.
|
|
![]() |
|
Count Rupert
Forum Warrior Joined: 01 Sep 2013 Location: Lost in Thought Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 11 Aug 2015 at 21:12 |
I think you're grossly overestimating the way the AI is going to work. Like the AI is going to see your campsites and sprint armies after them as a direct response. I suppose it may work that way. I see it more of an extension to the behavior we've already been seeing. In that since they "turned" on factions, the different factions have been sending out armies to patrol their respective areas. Before this change when one of these armies bumped into one of yours, you simply got a message about them passing by your campsite as they moved on. I think that all that's changed is now when these bumps occur with one of the factions affected by this change, there will be a battle instead of the message. My experience has been that faction patrols bumping into one of my units occur infrequently and randomly. I don't see this changing.
|
|
![]() |
|
Alcie
Forum Warrior Joined: 02 Dec 2012 Status: Offline Points: 308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 12 Aug 2015 at 03:04 |
I assume it will be mostly passive as well. But I think we are crossing our toes in regards to the super negative standings which imply non-passivity: -75 Will actively seek out and try to destroy cities within a certain radius of faction hub -90 Pure hatred, will attempt to destroy at any cost |
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 12 Aug 2015 at 04:02 |
|
That certainly sounds more interesting than:
-90 May accidentally collide with armies during routine patrols |
|
![]() |
|
Endrok
Wordsmith Joined: 12 May 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 12 Aug 2015 at 11:00 |
I can understand that at a standing of -50 or less where the description is:
"
May attack
and kill any units they see in "their territory"
But once the standing falls below -75 the description changes to:
"Will actively seek out and try to destroy cities within a certain radius of faction hub"
'
May attack' could easily apply to camps they just happen to meet whilst patrolling the areas around their hubs, but '
Actively seek out' certainly implies something a bit less random.
I suppose time will tell!
Once the other factions go live it will be interesting to see how they distinguish between camps of players at different standings .... will the AI just know standing and troop numbers or will they need to scout!
I suppose within a certain radius they could get a generic size (
horde, host, legion etc) in the same way players do.
However ..............
still waiting for the first attack!
|
|
![]() |
|
twilights
Postmaster Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply Posted: 12 Aug 2015 at 12:45 |
|
Again...they would be a lot more challenging with human control involvement with coding written to help provide information giving human controller options of activity....AI in games is always figured out quickly and with a game that never resets will date the factions activity quickly....human control
|
|
![]() |
|
Endrok
Wordsmith Joined: 12 May 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 104 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 14 Aug 2015 at 13:08 |
|
Rumour has it that a Court Martial will be taking place in The Tower ..... something to do with cowardly Shadow Mages failing in their sworn duty to
destroy at all costs!
|
|
![]() |
|
Dungshoveleux
Postmaster Joined: 09 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 935 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply Posted: 14 Aug 2015 at 21:03 |
|
I would venture that the faction military mission logic would have sections on:-
1 Presence of units from players - within faction diplomatic radius of a hub.
2 Are they friendly or hostile?
3 Are they bigger or smaller than us?
4 Attack or ignore decision based on 1, 2 and 3.
-75 I think relates to question 3
-90 I think ignores question 3
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply |
Page <1 56789 10> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |