Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
   New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 09Aug11 - Diplomatic Visibility Changes
   FAQ FAQ   Forum Search    Register Register   Login Login

Topic Closed09Aug11 - Diplomatic Visibility Changes
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
   Topic Search Topic Search   Topic Options Topic Options
scar View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 2 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Aug 2011 at 13:23
why pick on the thieves,the only role they play in the entire game is just that..thieving!
pinning them back with more hurdles takes away their speciality whether its in small teams or large.

Restricting their numbers relative to the size of the town/city they attack,  might be more appropriate, ie that the larger the town the more you can send would be fine,  having to keep sending groups of thieves out in small numbers is just simply making too much work on the keyboard, not mention very tedious.

restrictions on size of attacking thieve armies relative to town targets would also safeguard the smaller town without killing the concept of using thieves.

but TBH why restrict them at all? this is a game of all sorts, there will always be victims and besides,  from what ive seen in the GC,  people always gang up and track any would be perpertrators and get their justice one way or another as it is.


Back to Top
Kilotov of DokGthung View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Aug 2011 at 16:18
awesome sauce 
Back to Top
GM ThunderCat View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Location: Everywhere
Status: Offline
Points: 2157 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Aug 2011 at 23:29
Originally posted by Dakota Strider Dakota Strider wrote:

My suggestion would be, that for every 10 thieves in a group, they become visible 1 square further away than normal.   There is room for compromise on this, but game balance should be the most important aspect.
I'm not sure if its the high performance mathematical madness of this; or the sensible realism that intrigues me more...  Wink
Back to Top
Erik Dirk View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 158 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2011 at 01:58
On the surface it's a good idea, however i agree with scar, this would make it really hard  to get away with thieving a large player and really easy to get away with thieving a new player. Could we have a more realistic game mechanic for thieves where the more you send the less likely you are to succeed? Ie success chance = (Thief attack strength) * (target pop) / (no. thieves sent)^2 / (total thief defence) / (no. attacks in 24 hr period)

Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2011 at 02:06
arrrgh! would you people stop it with the math already? The GRE is OVER!!!

Wink
Back to Top
The_Dude View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2011 at 05:54
Maff are gud.  1 and 1 are 2.
Back to Top
Meagh View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 224 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2011 at 10:18

Originally posted by The_Dude The_Dude wrote:

Originally posted by threefoothree threefoothree wrote:

do you think we will be able to occupy a space for dips in the future so to set up a network of visibility?
That would be interesting - posting scouts and spies throughout the kingdom.  But I think the diplos would have to vulnerable to attack, too.  Otherwise, the map would be cluttered a zillion diplos on watch duty permanently.

just make sure they are vulnerable to assassination or even vulnerable to be attacked by other scouts (no two scouting parties could occupy the same square).
Back to Top
JohnnyBravo View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 15 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2011 at 15:13
I would love to see these ideas implemented.

I would like to have confederations or at least alliances share the visibility. (i.e. a spy goes past my town and all alliance or confed buddies can see it.)
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2011 at 15:16
Originally posted by The_Dude The_Dude wrote:

Maff are gud.  1 and 1 are 2.


It could also be 11.
Back to Top
Nesse View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 03 Oct 2010
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 406 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Aug 2011 at 20:59
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by The_Dude The_Dude wrote:

Maff are gud.  1 and 1 are 2.


It could also be 11.


Or 10.
There are only 10 kinds of people and only half of those understand this.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.